Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/StableCoin

I don't know enough about Wikipedia's policies to chime in properly, so if any proper editors see this please note that the person who nominated the StableCoin article for deletion is the same person who started the DogeCoin article, which, taken from his own words, is "Another altcoin article. Reads like a WP:PROMO". Also note the ongoing hostility that DogeCoin fans have toward other altcoins on places such as 4chan and bitcointalk. This is an obvious WP:COI. 90.219.195.99 (talk) 21:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also just noticed they created the Coinye West article too. How can they nominate other coins for deletion for being "Another altcoin article" while they're churning altcoin articles out themselves? 90.219.195.99 (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptocurrency is generally a favorite subject of mine that I heavily edit about nowadays. The reason I nominated this while making articles about other coins is because the articles I make can demonstrate that they meet various standards to warrant such an article. In addition to the 4chan issue, I am a regular of /pol/, /mlp/, and /g/ which happen to be hotspots for StableCoin discussion. While anybody is free to express their opinion and/or reasoning to keep the article from being deleted, I am monitoring those threads very closely considering the last time /g/ tried to save my own article (which while I appreciate their support, I do not appreciate the trolling of other established Wikipedians). Citation Needed | Talk 22:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The coinye west article may or may not be appropriate (I havent looked at it yet, but i have seen a lot of news coverage, including on the BBC, so it probably is appropriate), but that isnt rly relevant to this discussion. Plz see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for more information. Also please see WP:NOTABLE for more information on general notability. Thanks, Benboy00 (talk) 04:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]