Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Rod Dreher (2nd nomination)

CAN THIS BE REOPENED??? I do not see why it was kept even though most people voted delete. Wilerch (talk) 16:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The closing admin indicated he had no prejudice to a renomination (based on concerns other than the impersonator's objection), but I agree with the closure in that it was completely polluted by the impersonator's actions. –xeno (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But I'm not able to add another nomination to the article. Wilerch (talk) 16:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Write your AFD nomination statement here and I'll do it on your behalf. –xeno (talk) 16:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Y'know, it might be better to let the dust settle a bit before renominating. Rd232 ^talk 16:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yea, that's probably good advice... –xeno (talk) 16:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's not a vote, and because the delete votes were hopelessly polluted by the appearance that the nominator was the subject. 7 out of 23 delete !voters explicitly indicated that "wish of the subject" was a reason for the vote.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]