Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Red army crimes in Lithuania
Copied from project page
[edit]Comment: Since the author of the article has messed up the discussion by leaving comments all over the place, I have taken the liberty to copy his interventions and the text he commented on, here: ( --Pan Gerwazy 23:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC) )
- Someone said the author of articel under discussion must leave answers after every disscussion part, "mess gatherer" say - there is only one place.
Wiki rules: debate is not only woting.Ttturbo 06:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- The original author of the article under discussion doesn't have to leave any comments if he/she doesn't want to. The object of the exercise is that if the original author has a particular reason for wanting the article kept, he/she is welcome to advocate that. He/she should ideally explain that they have contributed heavily to the article, but that's a custom honoured more in the breach than the observance. Commenting after every single contribution is probably a bit much, particularly if there's nothing in particular to say. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Disappeared comment
[edit]Ttturbo put all his threaded comment back on the project page, but forgot to put my threaded comment back, which has now disappeared from both pages. I wrote:
- **Comment And now User:Ttturbo is edit-warring with several other editors there, trying to establish links to this article. Even using anonymous IP to avoid 3RR. I suppose a short block may be in order. --Pan Gerwazy 15:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Too bad that last one was a good prediction. --Pan Gerwazy 10:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)