Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/PC Advisor
WP:BRR
[edit]Even though the edit sequence now is BRR, I suggest that an NAC stand down after making a NAC close. Also, note that the imperative mood in the template has no standing as a guideline. Unscintillating (talk) 01:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Unscintillating - I did go to the editors talkpage shortly after[1] where they simply said "k", I told them straight they either drag me to ANI over it or they move on ... They've done the latter so I don't really see the point in creating unnecessary drama all over a minor mistake, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, to be quite honest, I actually regret making the revert. I shouldn't have reverted over something as minor as that. But I'm not going to drag this to ANI or anything, no. I'm going to move on, and I suggest we all move on as well. JudgeRM (talk to me) 01:42, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Curious that both of you are worried about me moving on, when the whole point of my post was to try to ground the potential for another revert. Well, not the whole point, I was also providing a theoretical viewpoint. Meanwhile, thanks for the links to the rest of the story. Unscintillating (talk) 02:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, to be quite honest, I actually regret making the revert. I shouldn't have reverted over something as minor as that. But I'm not going to drag this to ANI or anything, no. I'm going to move on, and I suggest we all move on as well. JudgeRM (talk to me) 01:42, 3 December 2016 (UTC)