Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Muqadas Farooq Awan

Hello, I would like help understanding why my sources are not reliable. These sources are news papers and the subject of my Wikipedia page is focus of all the articles used. Other sources used were direct links to his repertoire. Any advice and assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Hello I am just letting you know that I declined the deletion of Orkhan, a page you tagged for deletion, because of the following concern: This is just not spammy. It's a short bio which is encylopedic, and then a short career history. He may well not be notable, but there's credible indication as president of the AZ Futsal assoc. Needs to go to AfD. Thank you. https://www.urdupoint.com/news/team/muqadas-farooq.html

I have edited this page, but I'm not sure what wikipedia mean

hello wikipedia editor i request you can you please check this page carefully no god or any wrong links is used in this And I hope you will remove Delection doubt notice soon And you will never delete this page Because isa notable person and journalist's page And he has given links to all the articles related to his work in his Wikipedia page. And we hope you can understand our point IamNasirZaman (talk) 15:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because this wikipedia page belongs to a notable person and a famous person

Hello, I would like help understanding why my sources are not reliable. These sources are news papers and the subject of my Wikipedia page is focus of all the articles used. Other sources used were direct links to his repertoire. Any advice and assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Because this wikipedia page belongs to a notable person and a famous person https://www.urdupoint.com/daily/livenews/2022-08-27/news-3255919.html

https://www.nawaiwaqt.com.pk/E-Paper/lahore/2018-05-29/page-15/detail-5

https://www.urdupoint.com/news/team/muqadas-farooq.html

https://twitter.com/muqadasawann?t=KvT0UpqYYO2r3XTtCaSR1A&s=09 IamNasirZaman (talk) 15:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The lot of these sources are worthless. The first is a tag search (too sparse), the second and third are articles she herself wrote (connexion to subject) and the third is Twitter (no editorial oversight). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 17:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]