Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ciplex

user:AkankshaG is not happy with me atm because of accusations at AN/I and COI noticeboards. Perhaps my request for this article to be deleted was way to pre-emptive and assuming? I know other editors here have found cause for deletion, but I think my reason maybe in the wrong... Phearson (talk) 06:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The box for AkankshaG's edit

I would like to disagree with the removal of the collapsible box surrounding the edit provided by AkankshaG. We are supposed to be discussing and examining the article content and sources. Other then for my reason for beginning the AfD, all disputes regarding my accusation should be directed to COIN. Tedder did a non-controversial thing by placing the edit in a collapsible box, in which anyone was free to uncollapse and view it. AfD should not be the place anyway to defend the author's credibility. Since no one who has voted can revert it, I have requested uninvolved editor assistance to have it reverted back. Phearson (talk) 21:57, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a soapbox that has been placed in several places. Probably worth ANI. tedder (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have been advised not to do anything else until the COIN is over. Other editors can do as they please for the time being. Phearson (talk) 22:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]