Wikipedia talk:Arguments to avoid in discussions

This page was nominated for deletion on 2012-09-11. The result of the discussion was redirect.

structure and appearance

I'm trying to imagine the best structure for this. as I'm seeing it at the moment, the essay needs maybe three major heading, each with a general description followed by a list of examples with variation. look at the way I structured the first section to see what I mean. what I can't decide on is the best way to present the info - a table form (as I did there), a nested list, and HTML definition-block structure, a set of wiki-section like the original article...? what do you think would look nicest and get the information across most clearly? --Ludwigs2 17:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charts look nice. I see one has been built already. I like how it is small and simple as opposed to being long, which makes it hard to edit. It is also possible to introduce multiple columns in a chart.

Either way, I feel we should have this page as well as the older ones for now, because people are used to the older ones. Once people get used to this, they can be merged. Sebwite (talk) 01:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]