Jump to content

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Signpost
WP:POST/N
Newsroom


Welcome to the central hub of The Signpost!

This is The Signpost Newsroom, a place where The Signpost team can coordinate with writers, both regular and occasional, and people who have suggestions for topics to cover. See the boxes below if you have suggestions (something for the team to write about in regular columns), proposal/submissions (for articles you want to write/have written yourself), or want to create a pre-formatted draft article in your userspace, with helpful links and easy-to-edit syntax. Discussion occurs both here and in the Signpost Discord.


Discussion of upcoming issues is done at the newsroom talk page. For general feedback on The Signpost as a whole, go to our talk page. To learn more about The Signpost, see our about page.

The Signpost currently has 5707 articles, 712 issues, and 13996 pages (4567 talk and 9429 non-talk).

Links:

Suggest a topic

To suggest a topic to be covered by The Signpost, simply click on the button below or post to our suggestions page manually. Example of good topics are

  • Editors who have done something extraordinary/wonderful
  • Ongoing discussions
  • Media coverage of Wikipedia
  • Technical news
  • Updates to important tools and templates
  • Wikipedia-related events

but many more exist.


Email a private tip to the EiC
Propose/submit an article

If you have an idea for an article you would like to write, you can submit it for review by the editorial team. You can do so by clicking the button below or by posting to our submissions page manually.

  • News articles should be kept relatively neutral and report on a specific piece of actual news. They can be on any topic of interest to Wikipedians, from general events, to technical news.
  • Opinion pieces are evaluate on originality, relevance to Wikipedians, and the quality of the arguments. They should provoke thought and encourage productive discussion.
  • Special pieces cover things that don't fall neatly in the above two categories. If it's interesting to you, it's likely interesting to someone else as well. Check with us and we'll see what can be done!

Create a draft

To create a draft of an article in your userspace, simply copy-paste {{subst:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload}} at Special:MyPage/Signpost draft (replacing USERNAME with your own username).

You can also use the button below. This will preload a form, which you can then save and edit. We recommend saving without making any edits to the preloaded form before starting to write your article.



Calendar: current deadline is highlighted, and current UTC date is 2025-05-30 05:09:30.
April 2025
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
31 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 01 02 03 04
May 2025
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
28 29 30 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 01
June 2025
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
26 27 28 29 30 31 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 01 02 03 04 05 06

Article status

[edit]

Below here is an automatically generated master list of every page whose title starts with Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/. It's automatically generated by SDZeroBot every day. Also consult the mockup page for the next issue to make sure all of their titles, images and blurbs are correct.

You should click the button to manually update it and make sure it's current before doing anything serious.

Note: There are also a bunch of things in /Drafts and /Next next issue. When prepping an issue, make sure that articles in this expand-o-box are accounted for.

Sometimes titles will get messed up -- anything between here and the next horizontal line has a title error and needs to be fixed.

End of parseable title errors


Also, these categories (Purge):

Ready for copyedit Copyedit done Final approval Cat #
no no no Signpost drafts, not ready for copyedit 46
yes no no Signpost drafts, ready for copyedit 6
yes yes no Signpost drafts, ready for final check 6
yes yes yes Signpost drafts, ready for publication 6

From the editor

Not started ·
Resources


Arbitration report

Not started ·
Resources


Comix

Done · 1,600b
last edited 2025-05-18 02:31:12 by JPxG
Resources· next-next issue draft· staging area

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Green checkmarkY Copyedit done
  • Green checkmarkY Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


Cobwebs

Not started ·
Resources


Disinformation report

Not started ·
Resources


Discussion report

In progress · 13,321b
last edited 2025-05-27 21:43:18 by JPxG
Resources

Checklist

  • Red X symbolN Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
Discussion

As previously discussed, I have finished (or at least made functional) the script that parses and entables noticeboard threads. Here is the top 50 or so noticeboard threads since the beginning of the year (47, to be precise, which is the number of discussions above the byte threshold that I set to 70,000).

Sort this by "length" to get them ranked. I think that this would make for a decent discussion report. This is a very large amount, of course -- since it is for five whole months, and not three weeks -- I think if we did this every issue we could go in a lot greater depth but unfortunately there is a lot to cover which means a lot to gloss over quickly. jp×g🗯️ 21:28, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My thinking on this, more or less, is that we ought to print something, even if it is not Pulitzer material, and that something is better than nothing.
It would be very nice if we could actually analyze these, as I did for AfDs at the deletion report a long while ago (in the days of having time for things) -- but if there is not sufficient time to actually go through and analyze them, we ought to summarize them, and if there is not sufficient time to summarize them, we ought to at least reprint what the closing statements were, and if there is not sufficient time to do that, I think the bare minimum would be to just publish them as a list.
As more time goes by, the job of catchup for these will only become more difficult (as with the quite lethargic arb report), so I would very much like someone to write something fleshing these out, but if this cannot be managed I will just put something in like a very bare-bones list. jp×g🗯️ 21:37, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content
short archive head length timestamps userlinks usertalks distusers maxindent firsttime lasttime
AN 370 Tban appeal 71957 105 119 105 73 11 2025-03-25 21:44:00 2025-04-02 19:44:00
ANI Current Is it appropriate for an Admin editor to create an article just to put Nazi ancestral claims into a BLP? 173923 257 277 234 111 12 2025-05-13 11:19:00 2025-05-23 06:14:00
ANI Current Breakdown of BRD and potential Holocaust Revisionism at Roman Shukhevych unarchived 82751 127 142 128 65 12 2025-04-04 06:00:00 2025-05-23 06:07:00
ANI 1187 Disruptive editing from Wlaak 76230 124 196 126 46 9 2025-04-29 01:55:00 2025-05-15 04:49:00
ANI 1187 David Eppstein and Good Article Reassessment 168696 223 223 190 112 10 2025-05-08 06:51:00 2025-05-15 22:17:00
ANI 1187 Baseless accusations, incivility, and POV-pushing by User:TurboSuperA+ 97564 124 147 124 66 15 2025-05-07 21:16:00 2025-05-16 11:43:00
ANI 1185 Davidbena and euphemisms for rape 116372 185 194 148 112 13 2025-04-09 19:32:00 2025-04-20 01:12:00
ANI 1185 Ethnic Assyrian POV-push 78070 71 114 73 35 15 2025-04-03 23:49:00 2025-04-23 22:39:00
ANI 1184 Continuously disruptive editing by User623921 95858 70 108 70 30 15 2025-03-27 21:45:00 2025-04-07 20:52:00
ANI 1183 Disruptive Editing from User TarnishedPath 108664 191 206 180 90 17 2025-03-16 00:21:00 2025-03-26 19:33:00
ANI 1183 Transphobia from Ergzay 100052 200 217 178 96 17 2025-04-01 10:00:00 2025-04-05 06:29:00
ANI 1181 Non-neutral paid editor 192242 245 246 203 85 12 2025-01-16 20:45:00 2025-03-05 06:45:00
ANI 1181 Intimidation tactics, suppression and other violations from Simonm223 85072 100 115 96 58 9 2025-02-19 23:47:00 2025-03-05 18:24:00
ANI 1180 WP:BATTLEGROUND & WP:PA by Cerium4B 100614 132 168 121 54 11 2025-02-05 21:01:00 2025-02-21 05:57:00
ANI 1178 Me (DragonofBatley) 126597 197 238 199 51 17 2025-01-14 06:39:00 2025-01-28 06:08:00
ANI 1178 User:Toa_Nidhiki05: WP:OWN and WP:BATTLEGROUND behaviour. 82047 86 97 59 34 12 2025-01-20 23:40:00 2025-01-29 03:38:00
ANI 1176 Edit warring to prevent an RFC 94644 125 148 127 46 14 2025-01-05 16:37:00 2025-01-11 13:20:00
ANI 1176 Cross-wiki harassment and transphobia from User:DarwIn 146741 284 322 258 134 19 2024-12-29 21:02:00 2025-01-14 08:51:00
ANI 1176 User:Jwa05002 and User:RowanElder Making Ableist Comments On WP:Killing of Jordan Neely Talk Page, Threats In Lead 75257 139 174 123 48 10 2025-01-13 14:19:00 2025-01-17 05:49:00
ANI 1176 Incivility and ABF in contentious topics 143823 279 289 277 113 13 2025-01-04 11:19:00 2025-01-19 02:32:00
ANI 1176 User:Bgsu98 mass-nominating articles for deletion and violating WP:BEFORE 108540 168 210 171 66 14 2025-01-08 09:06:00 2025-01-17 11:52:00
AE Current Colin 102510 100 137 83 49 13 2024-12-12 03:02:00 2025-05-24 01:20:00
AE 351 Akshaypatill 72586 60 84 55 25 12 2025-02-27 22:50:00 2025-04-05 22:44:00
FTN Current Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine 280977 313 374 306 146 17 2025-02-03 04:58:00 2025-05-21 15:46:00
FTN 106 Pathologization of trans identities 292263 361 371 325 79 20 2025-02-07 21:59:00 2025-04-29 18:15:00
FTN 105 Is WPATH the gold standard for research on trans healthcare in academia? 87862 108 113 96 71 11 2025-02-05 03:25:00 2025-04-15 12:06:00
NPOVN 116 Geography map dispute 115161 230 245 228 48 20 2025-02-22 08:42:00 2025-04-11 07:31:00
NPOVN 115 2024 United States presidential election 76252 113 126 111 43 15 2025-01-09 05:46:00 2025-01-29 05:28:00
RSN Current Classical sources (Herodotus, Plutarch etc) 167449 167 168 165 39 11 2025-05-12 05:47:00 2025-05-23 19:42:00
RSN 476 RFC: Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor 96629 149 169 141 76 14 2025-03-19 17:59:00 2025-05-12 03:42:00
RSN 473 When RS make false claims, we do not treat them as true. 84851 92 94 93 34 13 2025-03-17 09:11:00 2025-03-31 19:09:00
RSN 471 Is the Cass Review a reliable source? 92087 107 112 105 62 9 2025-02-21 06:50:00 2025-03-19 16:54:00
RSN 469 Erin Reed, LA Blade, and Cass Review: Does republication of SPS in a non SPS publication remove SPS? 165288 168 180 168 70 13 2025-01-29 09:24:00 2025-02-25 21:39:00
RSN 467 RfC: Jacobin 156406 253 261 229 182 20 2021-07-19 04:10:00 2025-02-21 01:08:00
RSN 463 RFC Science-Based Medicine 89547 174 182 174 81 18 2024-12-06 09:20:00 2025-01-11 18:05:00
RSN 463 Jeff Sneider / The InSneider 72990 78 82 78 19 19 2024-12-21 05:16:00 2025-01-09 03:52:00
DRN 253 Autism 353378 287 372 289 34 19 2024-12-20 23:46:00 2025-01-17 16:26:00
VPR Current Finishing WP:LUGSTUBS2 78614 99 119 100 47 19 2025-04-24 21:26:00 2025-05-23 12:06:00
VPP 202 Rate-limiting new PRODs and AfDs? 132788 207 218 204 75 16 2025-03-03 04:45:00 2025-05-04 21:55:00
VPP 200 RfC: Voluntary RfA after resignation 82006 173 177 149 163 8 2024-12-16 05:14:00 2025-01-20 06:01:00
VPP 199 LLM/chatbot comments in discussions 262672 408 394 388 251 12 2024-12-02 08:12:00 2025-01-13 12:28:00
VPM 80 Heritage Foundation intending to "identify and target" editors 86113 190 192 185 148 12 2025-01-08 07:28:00 2025-01-15 11:27:00
VPIL Current Navigation pages 85904 160 161 152 59 18 2025-03-13 23:23:00 2035-04-06 09:07:00
VPIL 65 What do we want on the front page? 84416 157 162 143 62 20 2025-02-04 06:51:00 2025-03-30 08:34:00
VPIL 63 Opt-in content warnings and image hiding 110267 208 216 181 60 24 2024-12-11 15:34:00 2025-01-04 01:07:00
VPWMF Current WMF receives letter from Trump-appointed acting DC attorney 143897 287 297 283 189 20 2025-04-26 05:19:00 2025-05-24 02:36:00
VPWMF Current WMF plan to push LLM AIs for Wikipedia content 89165 108 112 94 69 15 2025-04-30 23:27:00 2025-05-13 08:08:00
jp×g🗯️ 21:28, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A much bigger list is at User:JPxG/sandbox/10k notices 2025, for every thread above 10,000 bytes (broken out by month and sortable by field incl. length). jp×g🗯️ 21:33, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is "entables" the leet speak for "tabulates"? ☆ Bri (talk) 21:58, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think this list should always skip all behavioural noticeboards at the very least. I am quite uncomfortable with the idea of "tabulating" which threads had the most discussion, when the entire threads is about (say) one editor's misconduct or similar. They also feel ill fitting to compare in the same category as the other type of discussions, like "Village pump discussion on Xyz".
Imo the "behavioural" noticeboards in this list that should be skipped are - WP:AE, WP:AN, WP:ANI, possibly WP:DRN. Perhaps a manual check can leave behind any AN/ANI discussions that are broader, like "What do we think of this part of admin accountability". I just prefer keeping them all out than keeping any "This editor's conduct was bad" discussions in the same vein as the rest.
I also see value in splitting the Village pumps from all other noticeboards, as separate categories/tables but that's not a big deal I guess. Soni (talk) 07:07, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the hat btw, this was blowing up the newsroom. As for propriety on user behavior threads, I have given this some long thought, and ultimately I think it is of public interest. Traditionally, we have covered arbitration proceedings in great detail, virtually all of which are conduct issues (almost definitionally so, as the remit of the Committee doesn't include ruling on content or policy). The justification for this isn't the clicks, or the lulz, but that these proceedings and rulings involve issues of importance to all editors: they are usually on issues (political or cultural) that we consider important, they often involve people central to our community, and perhaps most importantly they involve the interpretation and definition (and sometimes reinterpretation and redefinition) of our norms and policies. A lot of the time, a big dramaboard thread will be about thousands of articles, or some big process thing, or be the impetus for some new policy to be added (or some old policy to be struck).
Of course some propriety is called for with these, as it is with the arbitration report -- particularly it would be tasteless to rank them in the fashion of a "Greatest Hits" reel -- but I do think it is something that warrants a solid and sober analysis.
(It is probably also worth mentioning that AN and ANI have kind of become the all-purpose "throw whatever shit here" zone for the project...) jp×g🗯️ 10:03, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Valid, though I just disagree with your stance. I think if we're keeping them all, it would be best if the list was sectioned based off venue. AE/ANI/AN for "Editor stuff", VPs for "Village Pumps" and rest for "Noticeboards". Or another phrasal.
I think at least that reduces the ickiness I feel + will be a generally better use for the lists anyway (A 100K count RFC on VP occupies a much different space than NPOVN or ANI, in my opinion. So some segregation improves the utility of the lists, imo.) Soni (talk) 13:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not started ·
Resources


Not started ·
Resources


From the archives

Not started ·
Resources


Next from the archives

Not started ·
Resources


Not started ·
Resources


Humour

Not started ·
Resources


Essay

Not started ·
Resources


Concept

Not started ·
Resources


Crossword

Not started ·
Resources· staging area


In the media

In progress · 7,195b
last edited 2025-05-29 14:39:10 by Bri
Resources

Checklist

  • Red X symbolN Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
Discussion

Particularly sensitive topic

[edit]

This news story seems guaranteed to raise major complaints from at least two groups. I don't have a particular expertise in the controversial areas. I was looking for somebody who has handled this topic well in The Signpost before. @Bluerasberry: do you know of somebody who could write this up or even just be an "expert source" in the area? Smallbones(smalltalk) 16:37, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately the author of 2020-06-28 In focus, "Edit Loud, Edit Proud: LGBTIQ+ Wikimedians and Global Information Activism", which touched on online harassment and discrimination, hasn't edited for a while. But perhaps we could include a link to it as backgrounder. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They've got proposals

[edit]

Hello! In addition to Ryan McGrady's article for Free Policy Press, which you already added and proposes the implementation of a "Wikipedia Liberty Index", there's also a recent post from D.F. Lovett's "Edit History" newsletter, where he suggests that a banner that emphasized the fact that Wikipedia is "an ever-evolving, volunteer-maintained project owned and operated by a nonprofit organization" would help the platform get less misunderstood and criticized...

Thoughts? Oltrepier (talk) 20:02, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Signposters. [Following a conversation with Smallbones and HaeB] I'd like to write something based on the TPP piece to pitch to the Signpost. Some combination of excerpts and a paragraph or two about possible next steps (I asked them to put a CC BY-SA 4.0 license on it to facilitate doing so). What would be a sensible deadline for me to get you a draft? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:09, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhododendrites Sure! What did "TPP" refer to, though? At the moment, we set June 6 as the deadline for the writing process. Oltrepier (talk) 10:38, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tech Policy Press. :) Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:23, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhododendrites Oh, that's right! : D
Thank you very much for stepping in. Oltrepier (talk) 19:01, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and notes

In progress · 2,202b
last edited 2025-05-21 20:14:04 by Bri
Resources

Checklist

  • Red X symbolN Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


News from Diff

Not started ·
Resources


Obituary

Not started ·
Resources


Op-ed

Not started ·
Resources


Opinion

Not started ·
Resources


Recent research

Not started ·
Resources


Serendipity

Not started ·
Resources


Technology report

Not started ·
Resources· next-next issue draft


Tips and tricks

Not started ·
Resources· staging area


Traffic report

In progress · 26,152b
last edited 2025-05-23 23:53:26 by Igordebraga
Resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


WikiProject report

In progress · 2,343b
last edited 2025-05-14 00:24:24 by Bri
Resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Green checkmarkY Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


Community view

In progress · 28,120b
last edited 2025-05-19 01:39:05 by Jim.henderson
Resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
Discussion

The Community view part 3 is ready for copyediting early. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:52, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Forum

Not started ·
Resources


In focus

Not started ·
Resources


Special report

Not started ·
Resources


Interview

Not started ·
Resources


This table is generated by querying the database replica and is periodically updated by a bot.
Edits made within the table area will be removed on the next update!

Debriefing

In progress · 6,544b
last edited 2025-05-27 19:15:25 by Svampesky
Resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


T-shirt

In progress · 1,650b
last edited 2025-05-12 18:13:34 by Bri
Resources· staging area

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Green checkmarkY Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one




∑ 2 items | Query runtime: 0.01 s | Last updated: 20:27, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

End of auto-generated report.