Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject SUNY/Assessment

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts

Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject SUNY! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's State University of New York articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject New York|class=|importance=|SUNY=Yes|SUNY-importance=}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:SUNY articles by quality and Category:SUNY articles needing attention. The quality and importance ratings serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

SUNY articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 1 1 2
FL 1 1
GA 1 1
B 3 2 9 1 15
C 2 5 25 32 4 68
Start 2 1 61 214 18 296
Stub 3 54 241 4 302
List 2 10 1 13
Category 230 230
Disambig 1 1
File 20 20
Project 17 17
Redirect 1 1 2 16 20
Template 40 40
Other 2 2
Assessed 5 13 146 510 326 28 1,028
Unassessed 1 1
Total 5 13 146 510 326 29 1,029
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 3,611 Ω = 5.28

When assessing an article for this project, please add the {{WikiProject New York|class=|importance=|SUNY=Yes|SUNY-importance=}} template to the article's talk page as follows: 

{{WikiProject New York|class=|importance=|SUNY=Yes|SUNY-importance=}}
  • The class parameter should be chosen from those given in the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale. Note that you should not assign any article GA, A or FA classes arbitrarily. These grades must pass through official Wikipedia channels and undergo a peer review process.
  • The importance parameter should be "High", "Mid", or "Low", depending on how important the article is to understanding the State University of New York as a whole.
  • If the article needs immediate attention due to suspected copyright infringement, vandalism, exposure of personal information, or other urgent issues please add attention=yes
  • If the article has no infobox (and it makes sense to add one), please add infobox=yes
  • If the article has no photo, please add needsphoto=yes

Frequently asked questions

[edit]
How can I get my article rated?
As a member of WikiProject SUNY, you can do it yourself. If you're unsure, list it in the requesting an assessment section below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of WikiProject SUNY is free to add—or change—the rating of an article, but please follow the guidelines.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
Where can I get more comments about my article?
Contact Wikipedia:WikiProject SUNY who will handle it or assign the issue to someone. You may also list it for a Peer review.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
Relist it as a request or contact Wikipedia:WikiProject SUNY who will handle it or assign the issue to someone.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject SUNY.

Instructions

[edit]

Assessing for quality

[edit]

An article's quality assessment is recorded using the |class= parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject New York}} banner template on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following standard grades may be used to describe the quality of mainspace articles (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds them to the FA-Class SUNY articles category)  FA
FL (for featured lists only; adds them to the FL-Class SUNY articles category)  FL
A (for articles that passed a formal peer review only; adds them to the A-Class SUNY articles category)  A
GA (for good articles only; adds them to the GA-Class SUNY articles category)  GA
B (for articles that satisfy all of the B-Class criteria; adds them to the B-Class SUNY articles category) B
C (for substantial articles; adds them to the C-Class SUNY articles category) C
Start (for developing articles; adds them to the Start-Class SUNY articles category) Start
Stub (for basic articles; adds them to the Stub-Class SUNY articles category) Stub
List (for stand-alone lists; adds them to the List-Class SUNY articles category) List
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unwarranted; adds them to the NA-Class SUNY pages category) NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in the Unassessed SUNY articles category) ???

For non-mainspace content, the following values may be used:

FM (for featured media only; adds them to the FM-Class SUNY pages category)  FM
Category (for categories; adds them to the Category-Class SUNY pages category) Category
Draft (for drafts; adds them to the Draft-Class SUNY pages category) Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds them to the File-Class SUNY pages category) File
Portal (for portal pages; adds them to the Portal-Class SUNY pages category) Portal
Project (for project pages; adds them to the Project-Class SUNY pages category) Project
Template (for templates and modules; adds them to the Template-Class SUNY pages category) Template

The following non-standard assessment grades for mainspace content may be used at a WikiProject's discretion:

Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds them to the Disambig-Class SUNY pages category) Disambig
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds them to the Redirect-Class SUNY pages category) Redirect

Assessing for importance

[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject New York}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject New York|importance=???|SUNY=Yes}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance New York articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance New York articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance New York articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance New York articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance New York articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance New York articles)  ??? 

Quality scale

[edit]

Please try to search for examples. Please note that a B-Class article must include at least one reference. Examples from WikiProject SUNY are provided where possible.

WikiProject content quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
 FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. none
 FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. List of State University of New York units
 A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. none
 GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
A good article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;[1] and
    2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. none
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Stony Brook University
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. State University of New York
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Improve the grammar, spelling, and writing style; decrease the use of jargon. State University of New York Upstate Medical University
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. SUNY Learning Network
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of largest United States colleges by enrollment
Category Any category falls under this class. Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized.
Disambig Any disambiguation page falls under this class. The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. University of New York
Project All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. Wikipedia:WikiProject SUNY
Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. Template:WikiProject SUNY

Importance scale

[edit]
WikiProject article importance scheme
Importance Criteria Example
 Top Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field. Major system-wide article(s), e.g., State University of New York
 High Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. System-wide articles and main articles on University centers, e.g., Stony Brook University
 Mid Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. Main articles on other SUNY units, e.g., State University of New York Upstate Medical University
 Low Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. All other articles, including most daughter articles on particular campus topics, e.g., Statutory college
[edit]
  1. ^ Prose at the Good Article level is not expected to be at a professional level like it is for Featured Articles. Minor grammatical or style issues that do not impact clarity are not prohibitive of GA status.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_SUNY/Assessment&oldid=1156120175"