Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Azerbaijan/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The assessment department of WikiProject Azerbaijan focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles realetd to Azerbaijan. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the WP:1.0 program,

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Azerbaijan}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Azerbaijan articles by quality and Category:Azerbaijan articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

FAQ

[edit]
See also the general assessment FAQ.
1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?
The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?
Just add {{WikiProject Azerbaijan}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
3. Someone put a {{WikiProject Azerbaijan}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
4. Who can assess articles?
Any member of the Azerbaijan WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.
5. How do I rate an article?
Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
6. Can I request that someone else rate an article?
Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
8. Where can I get more comments about an article?
The Peer review unit of Wikipedia exists to provide peer review of articles. You can list it there for peer review, and possibly leave a note on the Project talk page letting people know of your request for peer review.
9. What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
10. Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
11. What if I have a question not listed here?
If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Assessment instructions

[edit]

Quality

[edit]

An article's quality assessment is recorded using the |class= parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Azerbaijan}} banner template on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following standard grades may be used to describe the quality of mainspace articles (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds them to the FA-Class Azerbaijan articles category)  FA
FL (for featured lists only; adds them to the FL-Class Azerbaijan articles category)  FL
A (for articles that passed a formal peer review only; adds them to the A-Class Azerbaijan articles category)  A
GA (for good articles only; adds them to the GA-Class Azerbaijan articles category)  GA
B (for articles that satisfy all of the B-Class criteria; adds them to the B-Class Azerbaijan articles category) B
C (for substantial articles; adds them to the C-Class Azerbaijan articles category) C
Start (for developing articles; adds them to the Start-Class Azerbaijan articles category) Start
Stub (for basic articles; adds them to the Stub-Class Azerbaijan articles category) Stub
List (for stand-alone lists; adds them to the List-Class Azerbaijan articles category) List
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unwarranted; adds them to the NA-Class Azerbaijan pages category) NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in the Unassessed Azerbaijan articles category) ???

For non-mainspace content, the following values may be used:

Category (for categories; adds them to the Category-Class Azerbaijan pages category) Category
Draft (for drafts; adds them to the Draft-Class Azerbaijan pages category) Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds them to the File-Class Azerbaijan pages category) File
Portal (for portal pages; adds them to the Portal-Class Azerbaijan pages category) Portal
Project (for project pages; adds them to the Project-Class Azerbaijan pages category) Project
Template (for templates and modules; adds them to the Template-Class Azerbaijan pages category) Template

The following non-standard assessment grades for mainspace content may be used at a WikiProject's discretion:

Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds them to the Disambig-Class Azerbaijan pages category) Disambig
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds them to the Redirect-Class Azerbaijan pages category) Redirect

Quality scale

[edit]

Importance

[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Azerbaijan}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Azerbaijan|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Azerbaijan articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Azerbaijan articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Azerbaijan articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Azerbaijan articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Azerbaijan articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Azerbaijan articles)  ??? 

Importance scale

[edit]

Statistics

[edit]

Current status

[edit]


Log

[edit]

A full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available; unfortunately, due to its extreme size, it cannot be transcluded directly.

Requests for assessment

[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.