Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/PIO (4th)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
PIO (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Ciolone (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 13:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
- Indefinitely blocked User:PIO [1] has a history of sockpuppetry, User:Agazio and User:Jxy being proven cases.
- User:Ciolone has appeared since PIO's indef block, canvassing on PIO's behalf [2][3]
- Editing the same articles as PIO [4][5] ; [6][7]
- Using an identical edit summary as PIO, the word integration [8][9][10][11]
- Canvassing on behalf of User:Luigi 28 [12], the subject of the as yet unresolved Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/PIO (3rd)
- Comments
- Conclusions
Yes, I agree. Likely sock or meatpuppet. Blocked indefinitely. Moreschi (talk) (debate) 14:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hidden category: