Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jaredsacks
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
- Jaredsacks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Sekwanele (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
FFMG (talk) 11:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
Started editing/responding withing minutes of User:Sekwanele, [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAbahlali_baseMjondolo&diff=258954986&oldid=258953686]. Also started doing the exact same edits as the user.
Both have very similar editing patterns. [1] and very similar arguments on the talk page [Talk:Abahlali_baseMjondolo].
Apart from that particular article, they seem to follow the same editing style.
- Comments
- Please...FFMG has a long record of simple removing rock solid references from articles
- The fact that more than one user is concerned about FFMG's stance, not to mention his/her open bias towards certain kinds of politics, a bias that in at least once case has extended to outright and blatant prejudice, hardly means that those users are the same person. This can very easily be confirmed offline.
- FFMG also has at least one supporter - yet no one has hurled accusations of sock puppetry on that basis. Let us please stick to the issues here. FFMG does raise some good points here and there about unreferenced statements. But s/he also recklessly and with clear political bias removes rock solid citations and that is a serious problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sekwanele (talk • contribs) 16:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There doesn't appear to be any damning evidence here, although enough evidence to suggest further investigation. Recommend WP:RFCU. BradV 16:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
- Agree with Brad. Editing patterns are close (esp. to do with South Africa et al). Would recommend RfCU; enough evidence for that at least. ScarianCall me Pat! 05:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please, i'd like to clear my name as soon as possible. I'm tired of being harassed by Wizzy and FFMG. Please let me know what steps I need to take to prove that I am not sock puppeting. Thanks Jaredsacks (talk) 17:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hidden category: