Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Durga's Trident
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
- Durga's Trident (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Report submission by
ScienceApologist (talk) 01:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
Admitted to sock-puppet that is a bad-hand account. Like User:IwRnHaA this account is designed for one reason and one reason only, but in this case it is solely to attack me. Evidence presented on the arbitration cannot be countered with arguments against this user who could be any of a number of editors who have declared vendettas against me. Bad hand accounts are forbidden on Wikipedia. If users wish to present evidence, their advocacy for certain positions is relevant and their past history as Wikipedians is relevant. Additionally, what is to say that this isn't a banned user like User:Iantresman? I bring this here to ask if a checkuser request is appropriate. I do believe that accounts that are designed solely as attack accounts should be blocked and banned as a general rule.
- Comments
I have made a motion at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Cold fusion/Workshop for the ArbCom to rule on whether this account is an allowed use. They have plenty of checkusers, so I am sure they will get to the bottom of it. Jehochman Talk 03:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
blocked by User:Thebainer. Jehochman Talk 08:10, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]