Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ctx6

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Ctx6

Suspected sockpuppeteer: Ctx6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets: Ctx1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log); Ctx2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log); Ctx3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log); Ctx4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log); Ctx5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log); Ctx8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log); Ctx9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log); Ctx10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log); Ctx11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 22:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Evidence is simply in the the closeness of the usernames. All accounts have been activated around January time and all acounts have been used for vandalism only. A quick check of recent contributions of all accounts will show strong similarities of vandalism

Comments

I'd like to add Ctx11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) purely because of the similarity of the username, and the fact it hasn't made any constructive edits. — alex.muller (talk • edits) 22:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 22:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Clear use of sockpuppetry. His actions are disruptive and I recommend blocking indef all the socks (he can later justify their continued use if necessary). Given that this appears to be an evasion of a block, I recommend blocking the main account for 96 hours. If that doesn't work, block for a month...but I'm getting ahead of the problem. I am concerned that Ctx1 was already blocked as a sock of Ctx6 (also blocked), but a block doesn't show for Ctx6? — BQZip01 — ^talk 23:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Definately not sock puppets. Just ignore this one lads. This is Alex muller signing out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctx11 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain"? — BQZip01 — ^talk 23:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, Ctx1 is the master, not Ctx6. Sumoeagle179 (talk) 02:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wimt has blocked all socks (who weren't already blocked). Except Ctx6 which could've been just an error, I'll find an admin to do that. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 23:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Blocked. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 23:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]