Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Assuredly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Assuredly

Suspected sock puppeteer

Assuredly (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

Suspected sock puppets

365 daysz (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
206.174.72.112 (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
Upgrade1 (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
Notatallyouknow (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

Report submission by

–Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 12:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Two accounts have been debating on Talk:Hurricane Ike/Importance, both with the same argument.
Both users have asked for another user's IM or phone address.
Both userpages consist of a one-word message.
Both users promptly remove sockpuppetry case notice from their talk pages.

Comments

I would like to note that 365 days was created late on September 18 (23:01), just nine hours (at 10:35) after Assuredly was warned that he could be blocked for disrupting the Hurricane Ike talk page. I would like to note that in that short period, Assuredly made only eight edits, each to either their talk page or to Hurricane Ike.
I'm not sure if this should be added, but I feel that Flyinghigher9 could be another sock. Though there are only 11 edits, though one asked for communication by IM, and another changed the importance of Ike. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On my talk page, User:Assuredly and User:365 daysz have replied interchangeably, with 365 daysz referring to comments made by Assuredly as being his own. Here he is referring to Assuredly's attempts to reopen a debate. Plasticup ^T/C 16:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe we have the same sockpuppeteer at 2008 attack at Beijing Drum Tower during Olympics. I found the IP address to have interchangably been used on both users Assuredly and Upgrade1 and our talk page. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Upgrade1 and I believe this to be the same person at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Crashingthewaves. .:davumaya:. 19:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Assuredly called me personally and told me that he should be allowed to continue sockpuppetry because it is the only way to fight against myself and others (I'm assuming at 2008 attack at Beijing Drum Tower during Olympics, that we defy our own policies and are not I'm guessing acting in good faith. I leave the interpretation and decisions to the community. .:davumaya:. 03:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note

The assuredly socks are Confirmed. Other matters are in hand. IP blocked. FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 02:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions