Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/69.111.77.41
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
69.111.77.41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
68.123.234.148 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
– AstroHurricane001(Talk+Contribs+Ubx)(+sign here+How's my editing?) 17:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
The puppeteer vandalised Talk:Seung-Hui Cho[1], by changing people's comments, including mine. The edit was later reverted [2] as vandalism. I warned the anon [3], saying his/her edits were considered fraud. The puppeteer went on to troll on my talkpage [4], and has not made any edits since. I sent the user a surprised comment, then another warning [5], after his/her edits were identified as vandalism/trolling [6]. A few days later, my talkpage was vandalised by a new vandal/puppet whose only edit was trolling on my talkpage [7]. I sent a report to ANI [8], then an admin said it was trolling [9]. I then removed the comment by the puppet [10], and my talkpage was protected [11] (note:there was an error in the template, it was later fixed). I then reported the vandals to AIV [12] (this is the diff when I fixed it). Why do I think they are puppets? They both trolled on my talkpage, both come from LA (according to WHOIS), and both use the same ISP (indicated by WHOIS).
- Comments
- Conclusions
Probably the same person used these IPs, but this is not a case of abusive sockpuppetry. Closing with no action. --Akhilleus (talk) 03:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]