Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkusership/Freshstart

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Even if I am not actively editing, I am usually monitoring Simple about 12 hours/day, and I have handled personal information, from payroll records (including Social Security numbers) to credit card numbers with expiration dates, for three different employers, so I am very experienced with safe-guarding sensitive personal information. I think that's a good combination for helping with this task. Freshstart 00:29, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

[change source]
  1. Strong Support. Freshstart is one of our most active contributors, and someone we can no doubt trust with confidential information. CheckUsers are needed in many vandal attacks now (thanks to the Vandal Tribune), and Freshstart is most likely going to be there to sort things out when needed. Archer7 21:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support. Excellent active contributor, good admin from what I've seen, and worthy of our trust on this. --Cromwellt|talk 04:38, 14 May 2006 (UTC) Strong support. Due to his actions regarding a recent RfD (a certain "AIDS" band), he has shown that he gets others' opinions if there might be a question, even if he is in the right. This means we can be sure that he would not abuse this privilege, and would ask the other Checkuser admin(s) on any questionable issues. Excellent user and admin. Definitely deserves our trust. --Cromwellt|talk|contris 03:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support. Great admin that we can certainly trust with checkuser. -- Psy guy 04:43, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Trustworthy editor. DaGizza 05:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support -- Netoholic @ 04:01, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Naconkantari 21:33, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Great member of Wikipedia and I would trust this user with the CheckUser tool. Billz 14:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support: Your work will take down a lot of vandals. --Slgrandson 18:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. SupportSarahgal 18:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support --M7 11:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support googl t 21:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support GangstaEB 17:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Picaroon9288 21:15, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support-- 08:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support - Tangotango 16:10, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[change source]
  1. Oppose. -- aflm (talk) 17:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose There aren't enough problems on the Simple Wikipedia to require any admin to have the checkuser bit. For the very rare occasions when a checkuser might be required, a request could be made of one of the English Wikipedia admins with checkuser capability. BlankVerse 11:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]