Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/cyberwolf434344

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

cyberwolf434344

Final (0/3/0); ended (withdrawn by candidate) by — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) at 16:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination

cyberwolf434344 (talk · contribs) – I have done quite a lot of work with helping around wikipedia also I have made some mistakes due to my adhd and anger issues. But looking past that I have made strides in the last month to clean up my mistakes and be more formal with users.Simply put I have significant successful csds and aiv reports and feel that instead of making all reports and waiting for admins.I might as well Rfa•Cyberwolf• 18:52, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Acceptwithdraw •Cyberwolf• 15:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

@Bureaucrats: The candidate has withdrawn. Serial 15:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?

A: I like challenges and need some more responsibility to improve myself later in life

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: quickly dealing with vandalism and personal threats

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Yes indeed like everyone else I have had some unsavory conversation but have improved my conversation skills and politeness

---

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

Discussion

• Links for cyberwolf434344: Cyberwolf434344 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for cyberwolf434344 can be found here.

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.

Support

Oppose

1. Sorry bro, opposing per answers to questions. Too much problematic behaviour in granting the tools at this stage. You've had bags of time to consider convincing answers that demonstrate that it would be to the community's advantage in making you an admin; using us to prove yourself capable of late-life commitment (?!) does the opposite. Most of your edits are semi-automatic. Your answers are completely un-evidenced and generic (how does one patrol for 'personal threats', anyway? It doesn't sound particularly productive past time, especially with a thousand other editors doing similar, and combined with the fact that you've effectively only been editing for six months, WP:NOTTET may apply in a year or two. Thanks for the self-nom, though; very brave and very welcome. Serial 15:37, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
2. Sorry, but I don't think you have quite enough experience to become an admin yet. You've only been here solidly for five months, and I don't think that's enough experience for a high-trust position like this. I would recommend that you stick around for a while longer before requesting adminship. I admire your courage to stand up here and self-nom, but for now I can't support. Schminnte ^{[talk to me]} 15:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
3. Per others. I would suggest closure. The Night Watch (talk) 15:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Neutral

General comments

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.