Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Werdan7
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful permissions request. Please do not modify it.
Ended on October 16, 2007 - 100% support
Hello everyone. I've been here for almost 10 months, and I'm nominating myself for adminship. There are many times when I could have used the tools, to delete test pages (I have over 60 deleted edits, and most of those are QD requests) or block vandals. Sometimes, when there has been serious vandalism, I have had to ask the stewards for help, because no admins were awake. I know all the policies, and how to use the buttons, so I can get started quickly if I'm accepted. Werdan7T @ 23:40, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Candidate's acceptance:--Werdan7T @ 23:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support
[change source]- JetLover 23:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. I've noticed that Werdan7 has some skills of being a vandalism patroller and meets the basic requirements expected from an admin, but discovered that about one-fifth to one-fourth of his total edits come from the AWB tool. While I can't oppose because of his great work as a counter-vandal patroller, I think that I could probably trust him to use the mop; as long as it helps simplewiki from vandals. --§ Snake311 (T + C) 02:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Support: "Get them if you need them". As one of our most vigilant NC patrollers, Werdan7 certainly needs them. The edit count may be at the low end, but another 75 (yes, I actually counted them) of his deleted edits would actually also count as they are part of the constant stream of QD articles we deal with daily. I have seen no problems at all with his understanding of policy and practice and fully trust he will use the needed tools for the betterment of the Wiki. -- Creol(talk) 02:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Creol said it all. Archer7 - talk 07:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - He is certainly one of the most active vandal fighters around. Strangely enough, he seems to be active at times when few other admins are. This is yet another reason to grant him the privilege of those few extra buttons. Sorry guys, I just don't see any reason why I should oppose this candidacy. --Eptalon 07:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support for sure. Majorly (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Support - hehe..long time waiting !!! ..--Cometstyles 11:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - As a RC patroller who fights vandalism, he will be more helpful with admin tools. - Huji reply 12:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I was wondering when you going to have an RFA. Oysterguitarist 14:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. You'll do great. :-) · Tygrrr·talk· 19:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I see no problems here :) ( arky ) 00:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- +1 --vector ^_^ (talk) 18:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support A regular on IRC --°Barliner°******°talk° 20:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — No problems here. :) Maxim(talk) (contributions) 13:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --M7 13:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- I think he definitely qualifies enough to use the mop tools Blockinblox - talk 14:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support FrancoGG ( talk ) 15:02, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Yegoyan 22:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Az1568 21:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
[change source]Comments
[change source]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.