Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Runningblader 3

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Runningblader (3rd Nomination)

I'm nomiating my self for the 3rd time. Runningblader,In Anti-Vandlism Project 22:16, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: self-nomination

Support

Support --Terry ^{Talk - Changes} 14:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Strong Oppose - It's only been a few days since your previous nomination. You have not yet shown a lot of need for the tools, but you have started to tag pages for quick deletion that are not in your userspace. You might want to consider an editor review.--♠ Lights talk 22:32, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:- I've been asking for deletion of vandlism pages not one or two but several of them. Runningblader,In Anti-Vandlism Project 22:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I've edited my comment.--♠ Lights talk 22:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - You still don't seem to manage quite easily project rules and conventions. --M7 (talk) 22:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-Your last RFA was too soon to have fixed everything. Sorry, Malinaccier (talk) 23:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed to Strong Oppose below. Malinaccier P. (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:There is my edit amounts.here Runningblader,In Anti-Vandlism Project 23:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose strongly - The only thing that really got changed since the last request (way back in.. last week - if it hadn't been Snow'd it would still be running) is the 250 some userspace edits that got deleted just to make the numbers look better. There is also the problem with changing the replies of other people on talk pages and the ongoing fact that article is not spelt artical. The fact that you got confused (shown here) about whether this RfA ends on May 36 or May 33 is also very scary. -- Creol(talk) 00:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - This nomination was filed shortly after the WikiProject was created. Is that a sheer coincidence or what? In addition, the last nomination was closed a few days ago. Chenzw Talk 03:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose per this. It's basically tricking people into supporting your RFA. Sorry, but I really don't like that. Malinaccier P. (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose [1] User:Jack Merridew a.k.a. David 13:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:-- Why are you showing a message that i fixed a mistake in? Whats so bad about that.

Strong Oppose This is even more annoying than my RfAs...same reasons as last time. Razor flame 14:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: — Somebody please snowball this. Cheers, User:Jack Merridew a.k.a. David 14:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Result - Closed per Snow. -- Creol(talk) 00:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.