Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RedWolf
I hereby nominate RedWolf for adminship. Since his first edit on 26 Oct 2003, he has made over 6000 edits, a significant proportion of which relate to disambiguation. He has authored many new articles and submitted several wonderful pictures. As far as I can tell, he hasn't been involved in any dispute, which seems to be a feat in itself at the moment. RedWolf clearly has a good understanding of Wikipedia and I think he will make a fine admin. Stewart Adcock 17:44, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Thank you for the nomination Stewart and I graciously accept said nomination. I'll help out with any administrative type tasks when I can (and time permits) but I understand that adminship does not demand any such tasks be carried out on any regular basis. RedWolf 04:46, Feb 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. (Based on above, haven't verified... somebody please verify) --Hemanshu 17:47, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Tuf-Kat
I don't know RedWolf, and thus am abstaining -- I do want to ask, though, why Tuf-Kat above doesn't indicate a vote, and why the tally below assumes he supports? I have no agenda in this....I just got confused by it. Thanks in advance, anyone who can explain. :-) Jwrosenzweig 17:01, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)Thanks, Kt, that makes sense. Should have checked the history. Consider me neutral for this vote. Jwrosenzweig 17:10, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)- Support, able to discuss and explain self as well as act. Stan 17:56, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Tally: 4 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral -- ends 17:44, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)