Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Razorflame 7

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Razorflame (7th nomination)

Ends on 24th May 08

He really deserves it. Hard worker. Breaks my heart that he isn't admin already. I don't think that i could edit here anymore if he doesn't become admin. I know that razorflame wanted to wait until an editor that he respected put him up - that is why am i doing it now! Love Ya Peeps. The Rosary! IuseRosary? ^(talk) 14:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC) IuseRosary? ^(talk) 14:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance:

Support

Support You deserve it Razor, my good mayte. Respect. Lovin your courage brotha IuseRosary? ^(talk) 14:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Go for it, Dude. You have my support.-- † Christian Man 16 21:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll Support him, but this wasn't supposed to be this way. IuseRosary you shouldn't have done this. Anyway, he generally has my support. But this was supposed to happen a month from now when other users are satisfied with his improvement. -- AmericanEagle 23:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Oppose - Too early - it's only been a few days! Nano chip08 ^Microchip08 on_WHEELS Lol! Random colour!16:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:you oppose because it's only been a few days...that's sad....if it were him nominating i could understand but it's not rethink you vote please.-- † Christian Man 16 21:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: No, not sad. People said that Razorflame needed ti mprove this, this, and that. With only a few days we cannot see if we have improved or not. Cassandra (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose- As I said, there is no difference to me whether Razorflame nominates himself or is nominated by another user. He is still a little bit far from being suitable for adminship. - Huji ^reply 17:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - This seems to be a replay of Simple11's RFA, only much confusing. Chenzw Talk 02:01, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

IuseRosary, I'm not really familiar with Razorflame, as I don't spend much time at Simple English Wikipedia, but considering that he just withdrew from his 6th nomination for admin, I don't believe it's fair to him to nominate him so quickly, nor do I think it's fair to the process of RfA. Please consider withdrawing this nomination, out of respect for both Razorflame and the community. --Kyoko 16:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. I think this nomination should be closed, as it is unlikely that Razorflame will accept. The life of brian (talk) 16:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the more nominations, the better. And, even if he fails or declines this one (Which he definately won't), atleast his next nomination will be his 8th, meaning, with so many previous RfA's and so much constructive critism, the next time that he runs, it will be impossible for him to fail. IuseRosary? ^(talk) 17:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luse, no offense but he may...its only been a few days. SwirlBoy 39 17:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The less amount of time between each nomination, the better - the less time he has to forget the constructive critisim he gets at each RFA. Joyeux Noel! IuseRosary? ^(talk) 17:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With less time, he can't improve much on what users have opposed for. It's only been a few days, I doubt Razorflame is going to accept this.--♠ Lights talk 18:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iuse, this reasoning will not be accepted by other editors. The more RfAs and the less time between them, them less chance of a successful RfA, ever. Deiz talk 04:58, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's even the point?? There's no way he's going to accept. Hasn't a snowball's chance in hell: close per WP:SNOW. --Isis ♠(talk) 18:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever is creating new accounts solely to add support comments for Razorflame's candidacy should stop it now. You're only hurting your case. --Kyoko 18:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest a checkuser if any more accounts are created. Or maybe a checkuser is already in order. But whoever is creating these accounts needs to stop. --Isis ♠(talk) 19:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Closed by M7 (talk), as too close after withdrawal: The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.