Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Psy guy
After being here for a few months, I feel that I have learned and more fully understand the finer points of Simple Wikipedia; therefore, I humbly request to be a sysop for Simple Wikipedia. I am an avid vandal fighter on English Wikipedia, English Wiktionary, and here at Simple Wikipedia. I am a member of the Counter Vandalism Unit. I am a channel staffer at #vandalism-simple-wp, #vandalism-en-wt (the Wiktionary vandalism channel), and #vandalism-meta (the Meta vandalism channel). For the full picture, I am an op in #vandalism-en-wp (the WP channel). In addition to CVU bots, I frequently watch for vandalism with CDVF.
I know that my edit count is relatively low compared to other new admins, but one should note that many of my edits have been speedy deleted after I have posted speedy tags on articles. In addition, I feel I should mention that I am an admin on English Wikipedia and English Wiktionary. Also, I have already served as an admin on Simple Wikipedia in a temporary capacity twice. I offer my logs as testament to my judgement as an admin. I feel that admin rights would assist me in the course of my work and help me to better serve the community.
I completely understand if the community feels that I should be here longer for applying for powers, but I strive to assist the wiki-community. Therefore, I offer myself to you for your consideration. -- Psy guy 23:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose due to your low post count on Simple English Wikipedia. The minimum is 500 to 1000. Billz 06:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Just curious. Is this your minimum or the project's? I looked around for admin requirements on this project, but I didn't find any. -- Psy guy 13:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's an unofficial thing that naturally developed. There's no official admin requirements, but they work well (1000 edits for experience, 3 months for observation). Archer7 | talk 16:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Just curious. Is this your minimum or the project's? I looked around for admin requirements on this project, but I didn't find any. -- Psy guy 13:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Support. I think we could definitely trust you with admin tools, you've shown that on other wikis. I don't have a minimum edit count or amount of time for admins as at this stage every case must be assessed individually. However, I can't really tell whether you do know the finer points of this Wikipedia. Archer7 | talk 09:48, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong support. -- aflm (talk) 19:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support because I've noticed him being a good admin on the normal English wikipedia. Picaroon9288 17:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Are his works on English Wikipedia releated to those over here?-- Tdxiang 07:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- No, but they are proof that he can be a good admin. See Archer7's comment. Picaroon9288 16:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. You do good work here, thats not the question. Do some more, ansd get your edit count up to 1.000 and I will fully support you. -- Eptalon 11:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support. You have what it takes to go far.-- 陈鼎翔 贡献 Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 04:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)