Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Padillah

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

padillah

FINAL (0/5/0); withdrawn by candidate[1] at 21:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

padillah (talk · contribs) - Myself. Even-handed, old-world BBS admin looking to help where I can. Padillah 20:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: Any that I have exposure to. I hear a lot about the lack of admins and figured, with my history, I should help.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: The Heroes articles for eliminating fan cruft and stepping in to protect articles that need it.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: The two occasions I've really stressed over were the gutting of a significant section of the Strange Days article and the use/abuse of Categories in The Haitian's article. In one I was forced to ask for a third opinion and the other was presented until the consensus became obvious and I backed down.

General comments

See padillah's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Links for padillah: Padillah (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/padillah before commenting.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

Oppose. I don't see anything wrong, but he is very inexperienced. Usually a user needs some more time. ^Mitch32^contribs 20:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Looks like the user does good work, but I think more experience is necessary. Demonstrating good knowledge and application of Wikipedia policies and guidelines is key, and with only ~500 mainspace edits, I think more time to do this is necessary. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - needs a few more edits. Insufficient answers to questions. — Rudget _{contributions} 20:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - only around 500 mainspace edits and twenty-five project space edits. You need more experience before you can get the tools. Sorry! —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 21:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Not enough experience. Answers do not reflect understanding of what admins do. Lara❤Love 21:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.