Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ozzaroni
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (0/3/0); ended 14:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC) nonadmin closure per WP:SNOW Wisdom89 (T / C) 04:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ozzaroni (talk · contribs) - YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Ozzzaroni (talk) 14:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A: I wish to help in cleaning up articles by blocking vandalism.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: I am most knowledgable in the area of film as I am a filmmmaker. I want to create more articles for film studios and small production companies or big ones that have no page. I watching the bio-channel alot and I am currently taking a film studies class, both of which would help me in creating articles.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: Yes I have, and to tell the truth it has been with administrators and thats one of the reasons i want to be an administrator. All except one of the administrators that i've dealt with have been terrible. Don't take any offense because i've only dealt with about 7 admins and i doubt they'll be reading this. They have been deleting my articles while i'm working on them and blaming me for claiming things that aren't real. Can't we cite the television as a source ? The one admin i hate the most is the one who has blocked our 6000 students school IP address from editing so I always have to edit at home. The nice admin, had good communication and restored my article. Anyways that's all for the troubles i've faced.
General comments
[edit]- See Ozzaroni's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
- Links for Ozzaroni: Ozzaroni (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Ozzaroni before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]Support
[edit]Oppose
[edit]- Oppose not enough editing experience and didn't set up the page right, sorry I just can't support--Pewwer42 Talk 03:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Sorry mate - you lack the necessary experience. I'd advise you to find an admin coach or visit WP:ER as time progresses to have the community evaluate your work. Come back in about 5-6 months. Wisdom89 (T / C) 04:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, I'd advise you to withdraw this RfA - no offense intended at all. Cheers mate. Wisdom89 (T / C) 04:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Vehement Oppose + Speedy WP:SNOW anyone? Disruptive, insulting, and not experienced to boot. Adam McCormick (talk) 04:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There is nothing insulting about it. He/she is a new user. Wisdom89 (T / C) 04:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please assume good faith! This new user is not being disruptive or insulting — he or she is just not familiar with the RfA process and its "requirements". Nishkid64 (talk) 04:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There is nothing insulting about it. He/she is a new user. Wisdom89 (T / C) 04:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]-
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.