Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Obaidz96

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Obaidz96

Withdrawn by administrator Tiptoety ^talk per WP:SNOW at 05:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Voice your opinion (talk page) (0/5/0); Scheduled to end 00:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

USERNAME (talk · contribs) - YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Obaidz96 (talk) 16:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: This was a Self-Nomination, and I assure you that I did this purposely. Vandalism must be stopped, and being an Administrator will help me in the 'quest' to stop vandalism and false information on Wikipedia. As the same as most Wiki-Users are doing so. ;)

ADMIN NOTE: The candidate has made a request to withdraw. Could someone please handle this? -MBK₀₀₄ 04:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: Clean up of Vandalism

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: I spell check, and make sure vandalism is stopped

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:That does happen, but I fix it and move on. Like for instance, I deleted all the pictures depicting the Prophet Jesus (PBUH) on the Jesus article. An administrator got angry, and I fixed it before he could see that I did, in his angered state. ;)

General comments

See USERNAME's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Links for USERNAME: USERNAME (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/USERNAME before commenting.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

Oppose It seems that you don't understand that adminship is a serious task. Sorry, but your lack of experience, history of disruptive edits, and has less than 500 edits in total shows me that you just need to serve as an ordinary user for a while, and once you master that, you could try again. Cheers, MixItUp 17:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose, suggest withdrawal I agree 100% with the above user. Adminship is a totally serious task, and a user like you -- with only ~500 edits, most of which are vandalism -- probably doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of gaining adminship. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Per the above. Should be closed per WP:SNOW. Lack of experience, generally candidates should have a good few thousand edits under their belt before applying. But I applaud you for being bold. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 04:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is transcluded improperly anyway. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 04:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose Doesn't understand how Wikipedia or RfAs work. Inexperienced. Disruptive editor, as you can see from the user's talk page and quick scan of contributions. Enigma ^msg! 04:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Needs way more experience. MrPrada (talk) 04:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.