Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ONaNcle

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

ONaNcle

Ends 22 May 2007

After almost 300 edits in the last three days, I didn't feel the need to become myself admin neither about blocking disruptive contributors nor about blanking entries. There are already enough admins doing a great job.

Only two reasons are left why my nomination could be useful:

I live in Europe and am connected while my morning is the time where most other sysops are asleep...
I track mainly the old mistakes and therefore I'll work much more quicker when given access to the Special:Unwatchedpages.

Candidate's acceptance: ONaNcle (talk) 09:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose You've only been here three days, and your edits have, in my opinion been rather disruptive. And, in stealing my signature, you've left a link to my talk page in it. Majorly (talk) 12:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The signature I had previously noticed from you was orange and red in User_talk:ONaNcle#External links my own page. If I did a mistake... we are on a wiki... just correct it ;-)))

The only thing I'm 100% sure if I happen to be nominated as a sysop : I shall not stop making mistakes. 13:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

You should correct it in your preferences, not me, and I don't want a sysop who will not stop making mistakes. Majorly (talk) 13:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol stop making mistakes... It was too easy ;-))) to track and correct a wrong spelling you have been adding on Simple yesterday. 13:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Uh that was intentional, and definitely wasn't a spelling mistake. Majorly (talk) 13:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Please do not misunderstand me, your edits are very welcome; I do however feel that you will need a little more time to get to know the way things work here (And yes, I am also in Europe, and go to bed when some of the other admins only wake up). --Eptalon 14:27, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Been doing good work so far, but I think you need to be consistent with your activity levels on simple.wiki for much longer than just three days. I suggest you try again in two months, or so. Nishkid64 (talk) 14:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I believe you need to be around a bit longer so that you can build some trust with the community. I think it is too soon right now. I encourage you to keep editing, read and watch what others do, and learn more about the process here in the meantime. - BrownE34 talk contribs 14:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
neutral --vector ^_^ (talk) 18:46, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Has quite a lot to learn. Sean William 21:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

back at school ;-))) I do realize how many rules have changed since my first several edits on Simple on Autumn 2004. The most recent one - that some sysops made me discover here this afternoon - is the circular redirect syndrome which was completely forbidden in those prehistoric days! ! ! ONaNcle 21:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - As per other users' comments. --M7 21:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Although you've done some great contributions recently to this wiki, you ain't ready to be a sysop yet. Sorry. --§ Alastor Moody _{(T + C)} 01:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet. We appreciate your help here, but it's definitely not now. Perhaps next time?-- Tdxi a n g 09:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. You still have some things to learn. As this is obviously going to fail, I'd like to close this tomorrow under WP:SNOW if there's no objections. Archer7 - talk 12:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.