Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nobody

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Nobody

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (1/0/0); Scheduled to end 14:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Monitors:

Nomination

Nobody (talk · contribs) – Nobody wants to go through the grueling process of Requests for Adminship. Nobody has been on Wikipedia for 15 years without making a mistake. Nobody is completely unbiased. Nobody should be unquestionably trusted. -insert valid name here- (talk) 14:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I speak on nobody's behalf. -insert valid name here- (talk) 14:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?

A: Nobody should have all that power.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: Nobody is an expert in every topic. Nobody is constantly active in all areas of this website.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Nobody has completely avoided conflict on this website. Nobody can please everyone.

---

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions are disallowed, but you are allowed to ask follow-up questions related to previous questions.

Discussion

• Links for Nobody: Nobody (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for Nobody can be found here.

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Numerated (#) "votes" in the "Support", "Oppose", and "Neutral" sections may only be placed by editors with an extended confirmed account. All other comments are welcome in the "general comments" section.

Support

1. Nobody is perfect. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Oppose

• Oppose. This is a completely biased nom without also nominating User:No one, User:No-one, and User:Noone. guninvalid (talk) 16:58, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

  These are Nobody's alt accounts. Nobody has the patience to make doppelgänger accounts corresponding to every permutation of their name. -insert valid name here- (talk) 17:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Neutral

General comments

• Just a question: if, say, this proposal were to be rejected, wouldn’t that mean that nobody’s admin proposal is rejected, and so everybody is an admin? - delta (talk) 17:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

  If rejected then the universe collapses into a black hole Gonna eatpizza (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

• it's over. no more admins. the vandals have won. rip wikipedia. RteeeeKed💬📖 18:33, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.