Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NewFranco

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

NewFranco

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) Final (0/6/0); ended 13:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC) - Closing per Snow and WP:NOTYET, per a clear consensious below. (non-admin closure) Mdann52 (talk) 13:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination

NewFranco (talk · contribs) – I've been on Wikipedia for three months . I used to edit as a IP address. My interest was shows, companies and channels. I've worked hard over the years. Wikipedia influenced my life because of the articles I readNewFranco (talk) 12:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A:

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A:

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:

4. Question from Kiefer.Wolfowitz

Do 248 responses of "Fully qualified candidate. Newyorkbrad" set a good tone for the evaluation of RfA candidates. Why or why not?

5. Question from Retrolord

What is your interpretation of WP:Snow?. Do you think it applies here?

General comments

• Links for NewFranco: NewFranco (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for NewFranco can be found here.

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.

Discussion

Oppose

1. Oppose: Please try again when you have much more experience. Technical 13 (talk) 12:36, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
2. Oppose. You have only made 348 edits [1]. Please try again when you have contributed a few thousand edits and have been using your account for a period of months (if not years). Thanks, and happy editing! — sparklism ^hey! 12:41, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
3. Oppose. [User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] (talk) 12:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
4. Oppose. Hi Franco. We appreciate your enthusiasm, but unfortunately there is no way that the community will be able to take your edits as an IP into consideration. With only 372 edits and only 201 of those to article space, there is no chance that your RfA will succeed. Candidate are expected to have made thousands of edits and demostrated measurable skills in a multitude of areas. You may wish to withdraw now. For more info, you might like to read this page: WP:Advice for RfA candidates. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
5. Oppose This RfA is downright ridiculous. Shouldn't someone put it out of its misery?,★★RetroLord★★ 12:56, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
6. Oppose Sorry, but administrators are expected to have a great knowledge of policies, not to mention experience. Three months is definitely not enough.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)