Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/MyNameIsKyle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (0/6/1); Withdrawn by user at 17:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC) --SoWhy review me! 17:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
MyNameIsKyle (talk · contribs) - I think I have really grown since I started Wikipedia, please read my questions to get of better picture of who I am, thanksMyNameIsKyle (talk)
MyNameIsKyle's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 16:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC):[reply]
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A: I intend to help with retrieving deleted articles for other people who are in need/want of them also i would liike to be a rollback permission granter.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: There are so many but I haven't had any large contribs but i guess you could all of my small one make my favorite. :)
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: I can't say I've been in any major conflicts but if I were in a conflict I wouldn't react I'd cool down relax and then kindly explain my part of the problem to the other person.
General comments
[edit]- See MyNameIsKyle's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
- Links for MyNameIsKyle: MyNameIsKyle (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/MyNameIsKyle before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]Support
[edit]Oppose
[edit]- Oppose - you have a mere 68 edits, 7 of which were on this RfA, which I had to correct. - Toon05 16:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I appreciate the thought but this is a WP:NOTNOW case. I notified the user and advised him to think about withdrawing. SoWhy review me! 16:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Oppose due to extreme lack of experience. Suggest closure per NOTNOW. --Winger84 (talk) 16:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Needs more experience editing, come back in a few months. MBisanz talk 16:56, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh-posse! Not wanting to pile but second the rest. Take your time and you'll do fine. Plutonium27 (talk) 17:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. With a bit more experience you may be ready for the mop. But right now you have fewer than 100 edits and little experience in admin spaces or article building. Majoreditor (talk) 17:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- Nuetral - I agree WP:NOTNOW I don't think you should, but MyNameIsKyle said it question 1 he only wants to grant roll back and retrieve articles but you still need a bit more experience. Keep on editing! My Account (talk) 16:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.