Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/MisterWiki

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

MisterWiki

Final (0/9/0); Ended 02:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC) - WP:SNOW closure by user:Anonymous Dissident -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 02:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MisterWiki (talk · contribs) - I'm a user who reverts many edition, i have 2000 edits (aprox) and i will delete many edits who are not deleted in 5 or 6 days. MisterWiki talking! :-D - 01:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: Closing discusions, deleting pages that clearly needs to be deleted. Primarily deletion. I will work in vandal fighting. I will warn users when they're not contributing in a helpful manner (of course, I always assume good faith, always).

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: I have been very busy filling in many of the gaps as far as music artists and songs are concerned; check Special:Contributions/MisterWiki for a list of all the pages I've created. Several of my creations have been listed at WP:DYK (seven at last count; currently have two more in queue).

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:: Yes, one. User:Diegogrez, I have many problems with that user. I would block users with these conduction.

General comments

See MisterWiki's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Links for MisterWiki: MisterWiki (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/MisterWiki before commenting.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

Sorry, but because of the answers to questions I don't believe you have a firm grasp of what an administrator does. Come back in a few months after you get an admin coach. Malinaccier (talk) 01:33, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not enough experience in admin-like areas, as demonstrated by only 59 Wikipedia namespace edits. A vast majority of your edits came during the last 6 weeks. Sporadic use of edit summaries. Answers to questions leave something to be desired. Some more experience is needed, perhaps an editor review or admin coach, as mentioned above, will help. Useight (talk) 01:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose Didn't answer the questions given in much thought. Also, I think this user isn't ready for the tools.--RyRy5 talk 01:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Your longest answer is 6 words. You can say a lot in 6 words but you failed to answer the questions to the extent that it would allow the community understand your desire to be an adim or your intentions once adminship was received. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 01:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While your first edits was in june 07, you have only been actively involved for three months. That is not enough time to assess your interactions on wikipedia. Jon513 (talk) 02:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose seems to have little grasp of the Wikipedia:Non-free content image policy per this upload [1]. Polly (Parrot) 02:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose answers scare me... particularly #3 where he would block somebody with whom he has a problem. Recommend speedy closing this on...Balloonman (talk) 02:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not the biggest fan of self noms. And your answers to questions aren't that in-depth. --Shark face 217 02:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very very premature -- user has been active less than a month. --Ginkgo100^talk 02:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.