Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kirachinmoku
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final 0/4/0 at 00:13 (GMT) 19 November 2008
Kirachinmoku (talk · contribs) – Hardworking, Honest, Reliable, Good Spelling/Grammer Kirachinmoku (talk) 23:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: Page Protection Services
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: I honestly couldn't say, though i think that my idea of adding protection to Hockerill Anglo-European College was good.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: No, i have not been in any conflicts
General comments
[edit]- See Kirachinmoku's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
- Links for Kirachinmoku: Kirachinmoku (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Kirachinmoku before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]Support
[edit]
Oppose
[edit]- "Good Spelling/Grammer". I'm sorry, maybe in a few months with more experience? Best wishes, – How do you turn this on (talk) 23:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Sorry...you are entirely too inexperienced for adminship. Your list of contributions is very short. I recommend doing several months of editing and other work before resubmitting request.—Gaff ταλκ 23:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, I'm afraid. Far too inexperienced. I also note from his talk page that he's been warned for (among other things) vandalism and page ownership.Ironholds (talk) 00:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Too inexperienced. In several more months. Please consider withdrawing, you shouldn't be discouraged by these results. --Banime (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.