Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Katerenka

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship, request for bureaucratship, request for checkusership, or request for oversightship. Please do not modify it.

Closed as successful. User promoted. --Barras ^talk 08:46, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Katerenka

Katerenka (talk · contribs)

Also Javert (talk · contribs)

End date: 08:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, everyone. I'm here to present to the community Katerenka for adminship. She has been here for 3 months (and nearly 7 months under her old username Javert). During this period, she has amassed over 1700 edits in her two usernames, with over 200 QD requests. The majority of her edits are in the mainspace; however she has been active in discussions and has multiple edits in different project space pages. She is also active in anti-vandalism work and DYK as well as RfD. If she becomes an admin, I believe she can help the admins in maintenance work, which would certainly help the wiki. Regards, Pmlineditor ∞ 08:12, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: I accept, and thank Pmlineditor for his very kind nomination. ···Katerenka (討論) 08:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support

As nom. Pmlineditor ∞ 08:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and active editor. --Bsadowski1^{(Talk|Changes)} 08:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good vandal fighting skills. —Mythdon ^{[talk] [changes]} 08:20, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support No problems here. User is active and fights vandals, and I trust this user and her judgement, so of course I support. Razor flame 08:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In spite of Majorly's valid concern, I think the candidate can be trusted. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support ad astra per alia porci. She is a perfect fit for this project and would be a great benefit as an admin. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 15:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support All my interactions have been friendly, even when I am totally wrong =) . Good luck!--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 15:35, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 22:30, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Prompt reverts to vandalism on IRC. иιƒкч ? 04:12, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course.-- † CR ₉₀ 18:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --vector ^_^ (talk) 07:27, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. Majorly's diff is a little worrying, but nothing to oppose over in my opinion. Everything else looks good. Best of luck, Malinaccier (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per change of heart. Happy holidays! —§ stay (sic)! 06:50, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cheerful Support Katerenka is a very good and trustworthy editor. She is kind and very polite, to the best of my knowledge, and is a fine Wikipedian I esteem! Classical Esther (talk) 09:36, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Looks like you know what you're doing, and not concerned about attitude. EhJJ^TALK 22:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Has a bad attitude. I don't want a know-it-all policy wonk as an admin. Majorly talk 14:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Majorly Purplebackpack89 (talk) 17:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, per Majorly. Also the Javert/Katerenka "socking" thing. I seem to remember there being some big discussion somewhere... Gob lin 18:51, 20 December 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Yotty![reply]
Your oppose over the Javert/Katerenka thing worries me, would you care to explain it?-- † CR ₉₀ 17:33, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, per Majorly. —stay (sic)! 21:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Regarding Majorly's diff: the reason for the thread was to help Griffinofwales out with QD tagging. 99% of the tags that he applies to articles are correct, and I happened to see what that wasn't. In the interest of helping him out, I made a comment about it. The exchange that ensued with Bluegoblin7 wasn't my best moment and is something that I regret. For what it is worth, technically, Bluegoblin7 is correct, and if an article that meets any of the QD criteria is tagged, it will get deleted. But we have those differentiations for a reason, and I was only attempting to help. ···Katerenka (討論) 20:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding Bluegoblin7's memory: for those of you who don't know, MZMcBride on enwiki seemed to think that I was user:A.Nobody for a time. Eventually it was confirmed by several members of the Arbitration committee that I was not. Full discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive203#Possible_sockpuppet.3F ···Katerenka (討論) 20:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question to Majorly: Could you please explain how there is a "know-it-all policy" attitude? —Mythdon ^{[talk] [changes]} 21:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.