Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jacob Lott 8
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (0/5/0); ended 07:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC) - Per WP:NOTNOW. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 07:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination
[edit]Jacob Lott 8 (talk · contribs) – Hi! My name is Jacob Lott 8! I am requesting myself for being an Administrator because I will do my best to do housekeeping and administrator rights on Wikipedia. I know I would be great being an administrator! Jacob Lott 8 talk 06:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: Once I'm granted administrator privileges, I would like access to revert edits, delete articles that are unnecessary, protect pages, blocking the accounts of vandals, and whatever else administrators can do.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: Most of my recent edits to Wikipedia we're undoing edits by vandals. When I be an Administrator, I would like access to more so I can protect pages from vandalism.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: I haven't really been in any conflicts, but if it was, it would be undoing unnecessary stuff from vandals. No other user ever caused me stress.
General comments
[edit]- Links for Jacob Lott 8: Jacob Lott 8 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Jacob Lott 8 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support
[edit]
Oppose
[edit]- WP:NOTNOW, sorry. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 07:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose Candidate edit wars on Spyro (series) using no edit summaries or talk page notes, then has the gall to say "I haven't really been in any conflicts". Nowhere near ready. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Thanks for volunteering, it's great that you want to be an administrator here. But, as you have currently made fewer than 100 edits, the community will not grant you the admin toolset at this time, because adminship is not really for new users. As PhantomTech says above, please read WP:NOTNOW. Good luck! — sparklism hey! 07:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NOTNOW per sparklism. Samsara 07:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per Ritchie333 - attempting to become an admin with your lack of experience and poor editing choices shows remarkably poor judgement, in my view. Jusdafax 07:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.