Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Isis

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful permissions request. Please do not modify it.

Isis

Ended July 29 2007 - 100% support

Hello, all. I would like to nominate myself for adminship because I think the tools could be useful while editing. I've been editing Simple Wikipedia for about three months (since late April), and have over 2.000 edits. The ability to block users and delete vandalism-only pages would be very helpful, especially when there are no admins around to do so. Isis §^(talk) 01:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Co-nominating- I was about to yesterday, but I wanted to e-mail her about it first. She already nominated herself so I co-nominate her because she's helped me in my wiki, she has very good edits, she is a monitor of the recent changes, she reverts, she creates, welcomes and guides. Model user and dedicated user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoey (talk • contribs)

Candidate's acceptance: (self nomination)

Support

Support as co-nominee. --zoey reply 02:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Huge Support. Isis has been a great and helpful contributor to this wiki, has participated in many activities, and has been needed in this project. I thought you already were one, Isis. j. rand|talk| ε contribs|email 02:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support, for me it's ok --vector ^_^ (talk) 06:32, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support see why Neutral because, as well as User:Zoey, I was waiting only few days to nominate her, waiting just for the soon next edition of the top 49 Simple active contributors where I was above her in the middle of May 2007 and where, in the next edition, we'll be both in the top half. ONaNcle 07:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Isis seems a very honest and reliable user and I see no reason why she would abuse the tools. Billz (Talk) 11:43, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have found Isis a trustworthy person. I think she would use the admin rights correctly. - Huji ^reply 13:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would definitely benefit from having the tools. Archer7 - talk 19:44, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Creol(talk) 19:59, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. A trustworthy editor who has shown a need for the tools and good knowledge of our policies. · Tygartl1^·talk· 20:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Isis has the knowledge, the right attitude, the infinite patience and the warmth and kindness needed to be an excellent admin. Phaedriel - 11:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Isis is among those people, who have contributed most in the last few months. I personally do not believe in those statistics about contributions cited above. Nevertheless I think those additional tools (page deletion, user banning) would give her nice additional frills to play around with. I fully trust her to use them wisely. I have no option but to support her nomination. --Eptalon 13:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. - BrownE34 talk contribs 16:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support- Hard worker that gets a lot done over here. Would be well-suited for the mop. Good luck!! —Curran H. ^{( talk | contribs (changes) | random (any page) )} 21:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. FrancoGG ^{( talk )} 21:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very bright and diligent user. --§ Snake311 _{(T + C)} 04:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Before I leave, I'll say yes. Isis can replace me when I'm away. :)-- Tdxi a n g 07:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oysterguitarist 19:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm Lizix and I approve this message! --Lizix 19:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - RaNdOm26 18:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Werdan7^{T @} 04:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Wasn't Isis banned from the English Wikipedia? Or is this a different Isis? 123.2.168.215 11:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the user from from english wikipedia. My account over there is User:Isis4563. :) --Isis §^(talk) 12:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.