Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Grunny

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful permissions request. Please do not modify it.

Closed as successful: 19/0. Chenzw Talk 11:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grunny

Grunny (talk · contribs)

RfA of Grunny

global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs · deleted
Last comment by: ShakespeareFan00.

End date: 01:23, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Friends,

I wish to nominate Grunny for sysop. He has been with us for a length of time that I believe establishes trust. I have seen Grunny to be very even toned. I am comfortable with the QD requests, the vandal reverts. There is no doubt in my mind that he will act accordingly to policy, guideline, and with sound judgement. Thank you for your time and consideration. Jon@talk:~$ 01:23, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: I accept. Grunny (talk) 01:28, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Jon@talk:~$ 01:27, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Without a doubt. fr33k man 01:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can use the tools very well and I trust this user with them TBloemink (talk) 07:34, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Of course yes, excellent work here, trusted. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Long-term editor. -- Menti fisto 23:33, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, has shown good judgement, and understands templates! --Peterdownunder (talk) 00:53, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As always I searched VIP reports and QD requests from the user in search of something scary, and grunny comes up clean :) Seems like a trustworthy editor, very capable of using the tools well.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 02:49, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me. -Barras (talk) 18:24, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I trust Grunny. chris †ianrocker90 18:57, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gob lin 19:00, 16 July 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Pmlineditor![reply]
Support. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 19:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Go for it. —stay (sic)! 06:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see why not :) Yottie ^=talk= 19:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DJDunsie ^{(talk · changes)} 19:15, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Has my support. Kansan (talk) 04:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support – No reason to deny. Bill william compton (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, definitely.-- Tdxi ang 03:58, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? Vibhijain (talk) 15:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Savh·^{Tell me} 09:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Comments

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.