Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Griffinofwales 4
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful permissions request. Please do not modify it.
- Result: RfA successful. (additional votes were made after the closing time, but would have had no adverse impact on the final outcome) Chenzw Talk 07:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Griffinofwales
[change source]- Griffinofwales (talk · contribs · count)
| RfA of Griffinofwales |
|---|
| Previous RfAs: 1 2 3 4 |
| global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs · deleted |
| Last comment by: Chenzw. |
End date: 13:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi all, today I am here to nominate Griffinofwales for adminship. Griff is a former admin who has held the mop for many years and has shown right temperament and level-headedness needed to be a good admin. He also does WikiElf work that needs to be done but usually goes unnoticed. He is also active in IRC and frequently requests admin assistance. I think having him back as an admin will be net-positive for the project. He is very easy to communicate and coordinate with and having him back in the team is definitely going help in handling tasks that need the admin bits. Thank you for your time.--BRP ever 13:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Candidate's acceptance: BRP, thank you for the nomination and the kind words. As someone who has held the mop a couple of times, I understand the responsibility that comes with this role and appreciate the requirements and understanding of policy & guidelines that it requires. If accepted by the community, I plan to continue the work BRP has mentioned, working in the background of the project, helping keep our administrative backlog down, resolving community discussions, and assisting in making our community even stronger. As an editor for 15+ years on this project and an administrator twice (stepping away for personal/work reasons), I am happy to see that the community has remained strong and hope I can continue to support you all again in the administrator role. Griff (talk) 14:51, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support
[change source]
Support as nominator.--BRP ever 14:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]- Extremely strong
Support.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 15:49, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, trusted and experienced. Thank you for your contributions, and good luck! BZPN (talk) 15:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per everything I said in Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Griffinofwales 3. Welcome back! --Ferien (talk) 17:22, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M7 (talk) 17:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Why not? ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 17:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Raayaan9911 20:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]- support - goes without saying, but a fantastic editor. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I trust Griffy completely fr33kman 23:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Lionel Cristiano (talk) 14:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support They have done a good job in their previous tenures, welcome back.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:01, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lots of anti-vandalism work and previous admin experience, why not? Kurnahusa (talk) 06:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Griff is not only a fantastic editor but they're also an extremely helpful, patient, calm and level-headed person, They do their very best to not only help but to also resolve issues that arise. They also show a lot of empathy and sincerity in situations and they also help you understand situations or processes where sometimes situations and processes just don't make sense which goes a long way, Without a shadow of a doubt they would make (excuse my language) a bloody great admin again!!. There are not enough 0's in this world to support this nomination so I'll settle with "10000%" support :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support i think he/she is a great editor since he/she fight vandalism. 179.109.143.218 (talk) 16:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the support! Unfortunately anonymous (un-registered) users cannot vote on RFAs but I appreciate your words. I encourage you to create an account so you can get access to the many tools available to registered users to help editing. Griff (talk) 17:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Has a history of doing great administrative work and has continued to do good work on here since then. They would be a great administrator to have with us again. Chris ☁️(talk - contribs) 20:36, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Anyone who has held the mop for so long and still been and to balance their work life with their contributions and time in Wikipedia, it's someone you want on your team. DaneGeld (talk) 23:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ternera (talk) 02:56, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cactus🌵 spiky ツ 08:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think we need more administrators in Simple English Wikipedia because we need to make Wikipedia better. thetree284 (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support with best wishes! --Pot2156 (talk) 15:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator--Ksy 15:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Glad to see you found a healthy balance! Trusted experience, you’ll be a fine asset to this community as an admin. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 00:33, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Smart enough to know when to step away, trusted and thoughtful editor here, glad to see you coming back. Ravensfire (talk) 02:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support →TypeInfo (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
[change source]
Comments
[change source]May I please ask of @Griffinofwales: what has prompted the breaks in their periods of adminship on the site? Thanks. DaneGeld (talk) 20:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Valid question. The first time I stepped away as my life circumstances resulted in me not having the time I used to. I returned during the post-COVID environment where I had much more time at home. Unfortunately, my career later got much busier, requiring significant travel & time commitments that did not allow me to balance Wikipedia into my life. I now have a much more balanced role in my career where I feel I can provide the appropriate time to the community. Griff (talk) 21:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your answer. It sounds like you have managed the balance of life and Wikipedia very well. You have my support. Good luck! DaneGeld (talk) 23:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.