Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Goodnight123
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
(0/3/0); Scheduled to end 00:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC) - Withdrawn per WP:SNOW. GlassCobra 00:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Goodnight123 (talk · contribs) - I am really cool and should be an administrator because i created an article, Keith Hogan yea! Goodnight123 (talk)
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A: I want to like do all the cool stuff like block people delete pages.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: i created the article Keith Hogan
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: I don't think so....
General comments
[edit]- See Goodnight123's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
- Links for Goodnight123: Goodnight123 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Goodnight123 before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]Support
[edit]Oppose
[edit]- Oppose Thanks for applying to become an administrator! While we appreciate the work you've done so far, being an administrator requires a lot of knowledge about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. With only 22 edits, you haven't shown that you have this yet. I would recommend that you withdraw this RfA, do some work in the various namespaces, and come back in a few months. Good luck! GlassCobra 00:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You'll also have to keep your opinions out of articles, as you did here and here, and please do not create inappropriate pages, as you did with Directions to eating people and Goodnight123. These are considered vandalism. GlassCobra 00:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- sorry my bad —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodnight123 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You'll also have to keep your opinions out of articles, as you did here and here, and please do not create inappropriate pages, as you did with Directions to eating people and Goodnight123. These are considered vandalism. GlassCobra 00:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry to crush your adminship dreams, but I don't think you are ready, yet. Edit for at least a couple more months and get to know the place. miranda 00:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- are You guys trying to be mean to me??? i am a very good editor and can become an admin today! i'm not withdrawing, i know all the policies well, u can ask me any question! and i'm not trying to be mean to u guys either
- also could i ppppllllleeeaaaaasseeeee be an admin, i won't do anything bad
- Oppose - formatting issues and he doesn't even sign replies on his own RfA? I need look no further. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Then I looked at the editor's statement and userpage. I'm not convinced that this user has the maturity to edit Wikipedia, let alone administer it. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought anybody could edit Wikipedia? are you saying that i shouldn't be able to? are u discriminating against me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodnight123 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional comments. Candidate is a vandal. Another...--uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought anybody could edit Wikipedia? are you saying that i shouldn't be able to? are u discriminating against me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodnight123 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Then I looked at the editor's statement and userpage. I'm not convinced that this user has the maturity to edit Wikipedia, let alone administer it. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.