Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Frozen4322

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Frozen4322

Final: (0/6/0); closed as WP:SNOW by Kingturtle at 18:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Nomination

Frozen4322 (talk · contribs) – I have been a Wikipedia user for one year eight months, I have become active three months ago, and have been using Huggle without any major problems, if any. I have been granted the Rollback right about a month ago, and most of my edits have been against vandalism. I would appreciate all costructive critisism. Frozen4322 ^{Talk Stalk} 17:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: I intend to take part in a more advanced type of vandalism. I would also be using the administrative features on Huggle to further my Anti-Vandalism fighting.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: I cannot put my best towards a single article, but my best contributions are are probably my anti-vandalism fighting.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: As with all users every edit can be a difficult situation. Most of my conflicts have been solved without any serious incident, all of my conflicts were solved usually by apologies and striking out of my comments and/or reverting my own edits.

General comments

• Links for Frozen4322: Frozen4322 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for Frozen4322 can be found here.

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Frozen4322 before commenting.

Discussion

Oppose

1. Oppose per lack of experience. You show a promising Wikipedia career, but you have just over 1000 edits. You might have started editing 1 year and 8 months ago, but you had about a year with zero edits and about 95% of your edits were in May 2009. I also see no experience in content building, admin-related areas (excluding AIV), or collaboration evidence. Recommend another couple thousand edits, concentrating on article building. Tan | 39 17:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Oppose for recent vandalism. Seems to be on the right track now, though. Keep it up. decltype (talk) 17:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
3. Oppose per the above; in addition (a) you've been considered too inexperienced at CSD to be allowed to use NPWatcher; (b) article creations such as Nasal Drip (Band) and Moparscape.org don't inspire confidence that you have sufficient knowledge yet of how WP operates. Don't be deterred, though - gain more experience and try again when you're more established. Bencherlite^Talk 18:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
4. Oppose per the above concerns. You need to learn a lot more about how Wikipedia works and show you can be trusted with the tools before becoming an admin. Timmeh!_{(review me)} 18:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
5. Oppose per ↑↑↑↑ more experience is needed in article building. OtisJimmyOne 18:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
6. Weak oppose – You seem to be becoming a great editor, but you don't quite have enough experience. If you continue to improve, I see no reason you won't be qualified in a few more months, but just not yet. :) American Eagle (talk) 18:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.