Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fr33kman

Add links
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship, request for bureaucratship, or request for checkusership. Please do not modify it.

Fr33kman

[change source]
Fr33kman (talk · contribs)

End date: March 1st

Result: Promoted (23/1) Chenzw  Talk  01:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you Fr33kman. Fr33kman has done nothing but good for seWP. He is a hard working article builder and copyeditor. He also acts in good faith, and has never been uncivil in his time here. He has a strong knowledge of policy, and knows what he is doing. He has simplified many articles, he reverts vandalism, has a clear head, leaves edit summaries, and most importantly, stays cool. These are the qualties for adminship. I am certain that fr33kman will not abuse the tools in any way. Fr33kman was destined to be an admin. SimonKSK 01:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Co-nomination by SteveTalk - I feel that this user has a quality that few, if any other active admins here have, and the general community severely lacks - experience in dispute resolution. DR experience adds a lot of good skills to the table, and to the community. I would encourage you all to support. SteveTalk 02:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Co-co-nomination by Razorflame: Hi there all. I would like to say that this user is one of the most level headed individuals that we have here on this Wikipeida, and that he would definitely do us well if he were given the tools. He has demonstrated that he knows how to use the tools and that he can be trusted with them. He has also done great work for our Wikipedia, and definitely would be a net positive for this Wikipedia if he were given the tools. Cheers, Razorflame 20:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: I accept the nomination and I honestly feel quite humbled by what Simon has written. Thank you Simon for those very kind words! :) I thank Steve Crossin for his co-nom, and accept! fr33kman t - c 02:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC) I further accept the co-nomination by Razorflame and thank him for it. fr33kman t - c 20:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support

[change source]
  1. Support - I initially had some concerns about the candidate's period of inactivity during the Fall, but his explanation is adequate. People have real lives, and we can't all spend every moment on the Internet. –Juliancolton (talk) 02:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support as co-nom. SteveTalk 02:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Hard working user, he would serve great as an admin. Versus22 talk 02:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support as co-nom SimonKSK 03:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support I thought about it, and yes I feel I can support you, per Juliancolton.-- † CM16 t c r 06:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support - I don't know what to say. --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 07:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support - Will definately be a good admin. Kennedy (talk) 08:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support - Great user! Barras (talk) 11:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support A little uneasy about the break, but I have confidence in you. Shapiros10 12:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support – TheAE talk 17:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support as co-co-nom. Razorflame 20:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support - Good user, no reason to oppose. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 20:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Can't believe I hadn't noticed this till now - support! Majorly talk 12:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support I saw this when it was being created and then forgot to support when it was transcluded. Definately give him the mop. -Djsasso (talk) 13:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support - Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 16:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support :) PeterSymonds (talk) 19:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support --Fairfield Deleted? 22:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Definitely.-- Tdxiang 05:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --vector ^_^ (talk) 06:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support - a good editor, who isn't afraid to ask questions and think about things. We need a strong team. Peterdownunder (talk) 11:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support – Definitely. While I somewhat agree with Either way, it's not enough for me to oppose. — RyanCross (talk) 00:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support - Æåm Fætsøn /ˈaɪæm ˈfætsən/ 10:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support as per all - I don't see any issues with the candidate and they have been a net positive to the project :) Goblin 19:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

[change source]
  1. Oppose while you've made great edits as of late (something like 1200 in 2 weeks), the four month lay off from October to February is a little too recent for me. I, personally, need to see you around for some more time before I could support. Either way (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I fully understand your reservation. I had to take time off due to a death and a suicide in my family and starting a new job. If those had not occured, I would not have had any time away from the project. Thanks so much for taking part. fr33kman t - c 02:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[change source]
Thank you, again; Welcome! fr33kman t - c 00:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Fr33kman&oldid=8876405"