Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ferrett3

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Ferrett3

Final (0/4/0) ended 03:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Ferrett3 (talk · contribs) - Enjoy Wikipedia, many edits, creations, and revisions

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept the nomination

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: Any and all

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: Richmond, Indiana, because it is my hometown.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:

General comments

See Ferrett3's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

Suggest withdrawal - most admins have thousands of contributions before being considered. You have under 100. --BigDT 03:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - less than 50 edits, probably should withdraw.↔NMajdan•talk•EditorReview 03:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Oops, wait, this isn't AFD. :) I'll only point out that the candidate's sole edits to Richmond, Indiana consist of changing a link, and then reverting himself when he realized he messed up. YechielMan 03:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Please take a look at the other noms on this page to see what is usually expected of administrators in terms of experience. You need a good deal more experience editing articles, doing admin-related tasks, and doing things on the project in general. I would suggest withdrawing, and perhaps having an editor review sometime if you'd like to have general feedback on how you're doing. Dar-Ape 03:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.