Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/DvDknight

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

DvDknight

Voice your opinion (1/8/0); Ended 16:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

DvDknight (talk · contribs) - I have many good edits here on Wikipedia. I have also been subject to some vandals. I will work to stop the vandals before they mess up Wikipedia. DvDknight 13:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:ok

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A:various topics including: band, government, music, and football.aslo protecting against sock puppets and vandals.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:Gaffney High School, I added information to the page and added sources. This is my high school and I added what is important to it on this page.Gaffney High School

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:vandalism, I reverted the edits and deleted some pages

General comments

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion

Support

Moral Support Please don't vandalize, and try hard not to make mistakes, like your poor-form nomination of cylonhunter. I hope to support your adminship in six months and 2000 edits. PouponOnToast 14:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Oppose Sorry, a lot more experience is needed in all areas. Please read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship. I strongly recommend self-withdrawal.--Hús ö nd 14:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Answers not satisfactory, less than 2 months and only a couple of hundred edits, sorry. As per Husond suggest you withdraw. ^Khukri 14:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose. Editor has less than 200 edits in all; has been editing less than two months; hasn't taken questions above in any serious way, given the brevity of answers; and was blocked for vandalism on March 5th, for 24 hours. I suggest that someone invoke WP:SNOW, perhaps after a couple more "oppose" votes, to close this down; it's just wasting people's time to read and respond to this. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 14:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
History of vandalism says it all. Especially when it's involved my page. Oh, and this: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/cylonhunter (which should soon be a redlink - created, edited, "accepted" and questions "answered" all by DvDknight) – Chacor 14:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Answers to the questions are totally irrelevant! -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up ®} 14:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Statement and answers do not show enough confidence and substance. TML 14:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Your answers — they're incongruous. Plus, you'll need way more time and experience. I suggest withdrawal or the oppose votes will rack up. - Anas ^talk? 15:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, and urge withdrawal. The main RfA page says that candidates should have gained the community's trust and show knowledge of policy, and at this time, your current record doesn't show evidence of either. Having been blocked in the recent past virtually guarantees that your RfA will fail. I urge you to gain experience on Wikipedia, make a large number of good edits (many people will prefer edit counts in the thousands), and avoid vandalising in the future. Your answers to the questions above suggest that you aren't aware of what admins are expected to know or do, so please also read and familiarise yourself with the guide to requests for adminship, the administrator's reading list, and the admin's how-to guide if you want to become an admin in the future. Sorry. --Kyoko 15:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.