Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Deezythegr8

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

WP:NOTNOW -DJSasso (talk) 17:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deezythegr8

Deezythegr8 (talk • changes • count • logs • page moves • block log • email)

RfA of Deezythegr8

global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs · deleted
Last comment by: ShakespeareFan00.

End date: 20:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

I feel I am a good help to the wiki world & I can help out when others aren't available. self-nomination Candidate's acceptance: Accept

Support

Oppose

Strong Oppose: I strongly oppose. This user does not meet any off the Administrator standards and therefore should not only be declined, but also should have the proposal ended early. Pending ^{(tell me I screwed up}^{and where)} 20:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While your edits are good you have only been here 2 days. I will happily Support in a few months time when you have more experince with dealing with vandalism and Requests for deletion.--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 20:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. You've only been here two days. Very few of your edits have been on articles -- they're almost all on your own user page. Before becoming an admin you need to show that you understand the policies and guidelines here, and the way we do things. Do some more work on articles -- creating them, improving them, undoing vandalism, etc. before looking for any rights. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: I am a strong supporter of giving editors admin privileges to those who are established and show they can be trusted with the buttons. With that being said, being here for only a couple of days is a far cry from being established and a trusted editor of the community. Enfcer (talk) 23:38, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone SNOW this please? Kennedy ^(talk) 23:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Totally new to Wikipedia. Refer to CentralAuth. Speedy close please. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 11:02, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the others. Sorry, you are too new here and it is way too soon for you to get admin rights. Please make a lot of constructive contributions (not just to your userspace) and also have an understanding of the policies here first. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 11:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Comment: It has come to my attention that User:Deezythegr8 has a time user box on his user page, that says he has been on the Simple English Wikipedia for over a year and ten months, when in reality he has been on it for two days. This may just be an accident, but I am speculating wether or not it is to make people think he has been here for much longer than he really has. -Pending ^{(tell me I screwed up}^{and where)} 20:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just asked him on his talkpage but considering the fact that he never responds to messages it is unlikely I will get an awnser.--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 21:47, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed, and also commented onto of your comment. -Pending ^{(tell me I screwed up}^{and where)}`

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.