Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cssiitcic
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Voice your opinion (talk page)
- Withdrawn by admin Tiptoety talk per WP:SNOW at 22:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Final (1/3/0); Scheduled to end 21:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Cssiitcic (talk · contribs) - YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER The user is a good user and will do his best to protect Wikipedia from vandalism.Cssiitcic (talk) 21:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A: I tend to take part in protecting pages and blocking IP addresses , mostly. I want to do this because I HATE vandalism and want to stop users from vandalising articles.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: My best contributions to Wikipedia are Robitussin DAC and Libraries Connect Ohio. They are the most important because I created them.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: I have not been in any conflicts
General comments
[edit]- See Cssiitcic's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
RfAs for this user:
- Links for Cssiitcic : Cssiitcic (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Cssiitcic before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]Support
[edit]- Support I like the answer to Q1 and the idea of blocking IP addresses. the_undertow talk 22:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
[edit]- Oppose sorry, but you have fewer than 50 edits in total and you have misformatted your RfA. This tells me you don't have the experience with Wikipedia required to be an admin. I would suggest you withdraw this RfA since it has no chance of passing and consider trying again in three to four months when you have at least 2000 constructive edits to show that you understand and can apply Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Best, Gwernol 22:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per malformed Rfa and little editing experience. Request closure per WP:SNOW. ArcAngel (talk) 22:04, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Lack of edits, experience with the project. --SharkfaceT/C 22:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.