Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cometstyles

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful permissions request. Please do not modify it.

Cometstyles

Ends on November 26

Very useful against vandalism. -- vector ^_^ (talk) 12:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance:OMG Vector, I just love the nomination, you should win an award :P ..I humbly Accept...--Comet styles 00:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Support Duh. Very helpful editor, and experienced with admin tools. I was going to nominate, but Vector's nomination is better than anything I could ever write ;) good luck!Majorly (talk) 01:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Excellant editor, great work vandal fighting. — Lights (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Triple Edit Conflict Support A good user who would benefit from the tools.--Werdan7^{T @} 01:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely will help this wiki.--Yegoyan 01:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - without any hesitation. --Boricu æ ddie 02:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jet Lover ^Bam! 03:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good vandal fighter, will help alot with admin tools. Oysterguitarist 04:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, oh yeah! --M7 07:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support --vector ^_^ (talk) 14:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, no doubt about it -- a real asset to the community -- Barliner talk 14:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Trustworthy. Understands policy. Will definitely help out with the heightened level of vandalism we've been experiencing. What's not to like? · Tygrrr^·talk· 15:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although he has started late in the recent statistics he is climbing faster than most other top 49's. ONaNcle 17:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. - Huji ^reply 20:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please (I thought you left, or something?) Giggy 22:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Plz. Plz. Plz. Omg. Omg. Omg. Miranda 22:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It will not change the final result either but this contributor is far under the 50 edits required. ONaNcle 17:26, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She is no doubt familiar with Cometstyles from enwp. Majorly (talk) 17:40, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support - of course, does some great work here. Ryan Postlethwaite 15:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To support or not to support. Hold on I'll take ummm... eenie-meenie-miney-moe... okay I'll support:))) --§ Snake311 _{(T + C)} 03:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support for what it's worth --Hojimachong 03:31, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cometstyles has done some great work for the project so far. He could use the tools. Nishkid64 (talk) 05:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Archer7 - talk 17:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Az1568 09:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - yes. Jj137 18:18, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - After looking through contribs, i now support! -- Spiderpig0001 Does whatever a spiderpig does! 23:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I know this editor from elsewhere. Edits check out okay. Good knowledge of rules. No signs of BITEiness. Go for it! - Alison ^❤ 12:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Have fun. :) --Isis §^(talk) 15:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Oppose - This user has not got what I believe to be a resonable amount of edits here (1000). Also, this RFA I filed about 2 months ago, because I belived that I am experenced enough to have dealt with vandals at this time, failed. (there were 2 disallowed votes by Daniel and Sean William) Therefore, no. -- Spiderpig0001 Does whatever a spiderpig does! 20:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~:Are you opposing because your RFA failed, and you dealt with vandals? Oysterguitarist 20:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

~~Yes. -- Spiderpig0001 Does whatever a spiderpig does! 20:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

Adminship is not about how many edits you have or if your are among the top 49's on the stats or what you have done on other wiki's, it is about if the community trust you with the tools, I don't think you should be opposing because your RFA failed and you dealt with vandals like Cometstyles does, I think you should be opposing because of how the editor edits, I am not saying to change your vote but consider what I said, one day a user might oppose your RFA because their's failed. Oysterguitarist 20:18, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~Vote Withdrawn. I now vote Netural. -- Spiderpig0001 Does whatever a spiderpig does! 20:23, 22 November 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

~~FYI, there is no longer any netural votes in here any more. --§ Snake311 _{(T + C)} 22:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

Weak Oppose Do we need to get every editor from EN WP over here and give them sysop tools? Cometstyles? Come on. We should give everybody sysop tools if Cometstyles gets this. Only thing Cometstyles does here is revert vandalism. This is the same way DerHexer got away with adminship. If we're going to be pushovers, why not nominate Willy on Wheels.

Editors who only revert vandalism don't need the sysop tools, because they are already doing a good job. How will the sysop tools help them?

However, Comestyles is a good editor, and I don't think s/he will pull a Molag Bal out on us.

♫♫ just another stupid hive-day. Wish it was sunday ♫♫ Sam24 18:03, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User made five edits, four to userpage. Also note: "Editors who only revert vandalism don't need the sysop tools" - then rollback is useless then, and bad pages delete themselves and vandals block themselves. Admins who revert vandalism are the ones who need tools. Anyone else, I'd question it. hmm. Majorly (talk) 18:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a rule against new users voting? no real reason for the oppose. I think there should be a rule. --Yegoyan 18:26, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no official Rule (policy or guideline) but there is a widely accepted general concept. This user's vote is not likely to be counted under a variety of reasons (created during the voting period, no edits, likely sock-puppetry). Even if it were counted, consensus is apparent in the matter of the RfA. -- Creol(talk) 23:12, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also (in continuation to Majorly's comment above), I see no reason for generalizing a situation abotu a special user who has contributed here for some time, to "every editor from EN WP". Of course, if any editor from any other wiki starts helping here and shows us that he/she can be trusted, he may get admin permissions, if it is requested. - Huji ^reply 18:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not to jump to conclusions, but, when I read this it makes me think that this is a sockpuppet of Spiderpig0001, does anyone else think this? . Oysterguitarist 19:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably is it seems he was blocked for sock puppeting on en, [1] before. --Yegoyan 19:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a sock, seems strange how Sam24 made a simalar oppose vote as Spiderpig0001 and Sam24's only edits are this oppose vote and his userspace. — Lights (talk) 19:40, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not a sock. Checkuser will prove. Also, those EN socks were Trolls too (again, look at Checkuser there.)-- Spiderpig0001 Does whatever a spiderpig does! 20:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will make a request to make sure. Oysterguitarist 21:27, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

25 pro/0 oppose sysop flag granted. --vector ^_^ (talk) 11:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.