Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Claimgoal

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

User:Claimgoal

Ends on April 22 2008 - Closed early due to Snow.

I'd like to nominate myself for adminship since I know most of the guidelines and have created some myself. I have also created lots of pages that should have been created a long time ago. Claimgoal (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance:

Support

Oppose

Oppose - You have made useful changes, but you have been here for just over one month, and have less than 500 (total) edits. You have shown little need for the tools. I suggest waiting until your three months old, or waiting until another respected editor feels your ready for adminship. Canvassing is never a good idea when your running an RFA either.-- Lights talk 11:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - How about waiting for a few more months? Chenzw Talk 11:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - You are but 1 month old, hardly enough to request for adminship. The preferred amount of time is 3 months, so I would suggest that you not rerequest adminship until late July. Also, you only have 167 mainspace edits, and only 443 edits total. I would be better off giving you the permissions if you had at least 1,000 edits total (combined in all the categories), with at least half of your edits to the mainspace. Also, I have doubts because you are not very active and you haven't been helping out with vandalism, which means that you have no need for the block, protection, or deletion tools, which composed more than half of what administrators do. I would suggest you brush up on the Wikipedia:Criteria for Administratorship before requesting this permission again. Cheers, Razor flame 13:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Simply too little edits, but your well on your way! -- Da Punk '95 talk 20:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Yegoyan (talk) 22:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - While you have made fantastic edits, I apoligize because I must oppose per WP:CFA. Sorry, but keep up the great work! SwirlBoy 39 01:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Lights. --§ Snake311 _{(I'm Not Okay!)} 04:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Try again later... Mⁱc_ro chip ⁰⁸Sign! 17:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

You did not create new guidelines, instead, you created new pages for them as some did not exist here. Chenzw Talk 11:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The first guideline I would suggest brushing up on would be Wikipedia:Criteria for Administratorship: 1 month, 167 mainspace edits (as many mainspace as user/usertalk edits) and had to be told to add an email address.. This is likely to end early due to Snow. -- Creol(talk) 12:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Move a motion for a WP:SNOW closure. -- Da Punk '95 talk 21:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.