Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chaza93

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Chaza93

Final tally: (2/5/0) 19:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Chaza93 (talk · contribs) - Quite unfair to judge myself, but, i really want to help Wikipedians Chaza93 18:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:'Accepted'

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I intend to prevent vandalism to articles, and help wikipedia become truthful and reliable in more articles

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: Probably when i do quick additions (ie after a football game)

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I have not been involved in any edit conflict, but will make sure that the articles are all correct.

I GIVE UP- but thanks for telling me everything everyone

General comments

• See Chaza93's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for Chaza93: Chaza93 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

---

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Chaza93 before commenting.

Discussion

With less than 100 edits, I strongly urge withdrawl and wait until you have more experience on Wikipedia. No one has passed with that little experience in years (if ever). Sorry. -- nae'blis 18:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Support

1. Moral Support - Unfortunately you're unlikely to pass. Come back in 3-4 months when you've made at least a few thousand edits. Don't be discouraged - I made a similar mistake myself with my first RfA, where I jumped in too early; after it failed, I edited actively for a few months, and applied again successfully. I'd be happy to give you help and advice on how you can achieve adminship in the future. Walton^Assistance! 18:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Moral Support per Walton. I'm glad to see a desire for a more active role in the community, but the community needs to see more evidence that you know the policies. Cheers, Lanky (YELL) 19:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose - Lacking experience Corpx 18:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Oppose with a the hope that a withdrawl or speedy close is coming...You have too little experience now, but could be in line for an RfA with a chance if you put in more time & check out all the links I left on your talk page. — Scientizzle 18:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Oppose. Lacking experience, demonstrated deficiencies in Wikipedia rules/procedures. Generally good editing record...just way to soon. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 18:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Oppose Sorry, way too early for this. Please withdraw. —Anas ^talk? 18:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Oppose for now. Sorry, but at the first hint of someone disagreeing with your edit practices, you're threatening (and actually asking) for page protection - see UEFA Champions League 2006-07. You've got to accept give and take. - fchd 19:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.