Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Catbar
Catbar has been here since December and has made about 800 edits. Solid contributor who deserves admin status. Meelar 04:48, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I'm pleased to be nominated - thank you, Meelar. I've found it interesting to work on the Wikipedia. I hope I can be a worthy admin. Brian Rock 05:32, Apr 25, 2004 (UTC)
Support:
- Meelar 04:48, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Cecropia 05:54, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC) I was wondering when we were going to get the all-cat channel on WikiTV.
- Maximus Rex 05:57, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Tuf-Kat 06:17, Apr 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Support, although 800 edits is a little weak. GrazingshipIV 06:29, Apr 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Seems like a good contributor. Cribcage 05:16, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Support. UninvitedCompany 17:19, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Looks active enough to me. Warofdreams 19:03, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Guanaco 01:47, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Exploding Boy 15:25, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)
- --H CHENEY 22:28, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC) Moggy made me vote support.
Oppose:
- Not enough experience here yet, IMHO. Kingturtle 15:12, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Neutral:
- Not enough edits, but I suppose a good worker. --Merovingian ↕ Talk 13:55, Apr 26, 2004 (UTC)
- Agree with Merovingian -- Graham :) | Talk 22:47, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I don't think that absolute number of edits is good indication of contributor activity in all cases. Some people correct typos and formatting, or don't use the preview button, and rack up a lot of edits while others perform substantial work in only a few edits. A quick look at his user page shows several pages which he has created. Also, although it is easy for experienced users to forget, 800 is still a lot of edits. Maximus Rex 23:15, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- That's why my vote is neutral and not oppose. --Merovingian ↕ Talk 18:24, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, but neutral is just a very polite way of saying "oppose" ;-). Maximus Rex 18:30, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Well actually a neutral doesn't hurt. An oppose cancels out four supports. Neutrals are ok. :-) Brian Rock 22:06, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, but neutral is just a very polite way of saying "oppose" ;-). Maximus Rex 18:30, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks for your support. I wasn't going to toot my own horn, but I am proud of the fact that several of my new articles have been featured on the Main Page: Jake and Hemotoxin are two that I know of. While I've done my share of fixing minor typos, I do prefer more extensive contributions, when I have something to offer. Brian Rock 23:39, Apr 27, 2004 (UTC)
- And I'm proud of the work I did on Black Box (game), too. --Brian Rock 03:43, May 1, 2004 (UTC)
- That's why my vote is neutral and not oppose. --Merovingian ↕ Talk 18:24, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)
- I don't think that absolute number of edits is good indication of contributor activity in all cases. Some people correct typos and formatting, or don't use the preview button, and rack up a lot of edits while others perform substantial work in only a few edits. A quick look at his user page shows several pages which he has created. Also, although it is easy for experienced users to forget, 800 is still a lot of edits. Maximus Rex 23:15, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Danny 02:21, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)