Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/CRocka05

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Non-crat closure. Withdrawed by user. --D_arkF_alls ^talk 06:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CRocka05

Voice your opinion (talk page) (0/7/0) Ended 06:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Withdraw, Considering it's just a joke to some. CRocka05 05:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CRocka05 (talk · contribs) - Self-Nominee, just want to help out the community. CRocka05 02:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I will revert all vandalism that plaques the pages of Wikipedia.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: My best contributions on Wikipedia have been to my former high school's page, Southaven High School, and countless edits of inaccurate info on music pages.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: As with anyone using this website, I too have had run ins with other users when I first started using the website, but I have always taken their advice and tried to keep my nose clean on the site.

General comments

See CRocka05's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Links for CRocka05: CRocka05 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/CRocka05 before commenting.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

Oppose Low edit summary, not active enough (recently came back after inactivity for a year). ~ Wikihermit 02:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just not enough experience on administrator related tasks. As the only outcome that can come out of this is a snowball closure, I strongly suggest you withdraw at this time. --D_arkF_alls ^talk 02:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose with a lot of Moral Support thrown in - You have simply not had enough experience. I would suggest spending some time in administrator-frequented areas such as vandalism patrol, WP:AIV, articles for deletion, and the incidents noticeboard. This will give you some experience on deciding when to block a user, when to revert edits, and when it is appropriate to delete. If you'd like some help, please feel free to talk to me, I'd be happy to help you. Good luck, and don't let a snowball closure discourage you. Sincerely, Neranei (talk) 02:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am disappointed to see very few participation in admin-critical areas, such as WP:AIV, the various village pumps, deletion debates, and some more that others might mention. Even more, there are very little edits to the Wikipedia namespace, which implies that this user is not experienced enough with how Wikipedia works and collaborates. There is also little to no edit summary usage, and that is another thing that participants in RFAs look for in candidates. I am going to have to oppose at this time, but work hard, gain experience, and you should be able to reapply in the future. —O (说 • 喝) 03:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Very low edit count, not sure if user understands all wikipedia policy's. Low use of edit summary's. Suggest user works on wikipedia a little bit longer and trys again later. Tiptoety 03:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Lots more experience needed in a variety of areas. Please don't let this WP:SNOW closure discourage you from editing Wikipedia. I suggest places like WP:AIV and WP:AFD. If you ever have any question, I'm available here. Useight 04:39, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Obviously a joke nomination, only a few hundred edits--Dacium 04:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.