Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bsadowski1

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Successful; candidate is now a sysop. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bsadowski1

Bsadowski1 (talk · contribs)

End date: 22:54 November 19, 2009 (UTC)
I have been in a lot of contact with Brian, both on wiki and on IRC. Brian does a lot of vandal patrolling and has shown good judgement in using rollback. Brian became active in August 2009 but was around a little bit prior to that. He has made a great number of his edits to mainspace, with the rest being made to user talk pages (warnings) and some to WP pages. He get's involved with the community discussions when he feels he's got something to add and has remained calm and polite throughout. Brian is active at times when there are usually fewer admins online and has shown the need for the tools more than a few times. I have found his assistance to be very valuable in the finding of and blocking of open proxies. Good luck Brian! fr33kman ^talk 22:54, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: --Bsa dow ski1 23:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support

fr33kman ^talk 22:54, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why not. He won't delete the main page(however tempting it may be ;p).--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 00:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
User has shown strong judgment in the vandal fighting area, so much so, that looking through this user's rollback has taught me better ways of spotting vandalism. User will, without a doubt, be beneficial to the administration of Wikipedia. —Mythdon ^{[talk] [changes]} 00:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Trusted user, plenty of experience, and very friendly. Should do fine as a sysop. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
-- Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 01:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support – He'll delete the Main Page. Good To go. Oops, I mean he won't delete the Main Page. ;) -- † CR ₉₀ 02:20, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Meets my criteria. Net positive for this site and will do a fine job as an administrator. Razor flame 04:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Bsadowski1 is very active and has shown that he has a need for the tools. No red flags here. Tiptoety ^talk 05:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Always in the cvn channel and reverting edits faster than I do. иιƒкч ? 06:43, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent in anti vandalism work; and has a pretty good knowledge of policies. Pmlineditor ∞ 08:15, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per username and

Indented IP !vote Pmlineditor ∞ 10:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Support One great editor and vandal fighter - he has an excellent understanding of the tools and policies. He has been a great help to me in learning to deal with the technical stuff. He will be a great asset to the admin team. He has my full support and confidence. --Peterdownunder (talk) 10:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good :). Airplaneman ^talk 18:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support - Will use the tools wisely. Yotcmdr ^=talk= 20:58, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. Malinaccier (talk) 02:06, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Liverpoolfan567 ^{Send me a message} 19:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. -- Menti fisto 21:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support ಠ_ಠ!i!King OF ZE Ravenz!i!ಠ_ಠ (talk) 09:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
--Mercy (talk) 09:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support works hard, means well and asks questions when he doesn't know the answer. whynot Jamesofur (talk) 07:14, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per whynot. Griffinofwales (talk) 14:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good addition to the current team. Does a lot of vandal fighting, ~~but I still wish some more article work~~. --Barras (talk) 21:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC) /me should not only check the edits when the RFA starts... --Barras (talk) 21:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ja. (And what's with all the {{support}}'s?) Gob lin 17:20, 19 November 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Shappy![reply]
Oppose is that better? =)--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 17:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. What the heck Purplebackpack89 (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Comments

This user has 165 deleted edits. From a quick glance, it appears they are good QD nominations. Bsadowski1 has only nominated one article for RfD and never voted on any other RfDs. Just some numbers that may be of interest to those discussing/voting. EhJJ^TALK 00:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are none currently, but I do plan to vote in upcoming ones. --Bsa dow ski1 00:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you vote in past ones? To me, this shows you have no interest. But never the less I weakly supported you.-- † CR ₉₀ 02:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No interest in what? —Mythdon ^{[talk] [changes]} 02:33, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, worked out on IRC.-- † CR ₉₀ 02:35, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. —Mythdon ^{[talk] [changes]} 02:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CR90: Would you r Brian care to share details of this "worked out on IRC" with the rest of us? IRC shouldn't be used for making on wiki decisions, and i'm just interested into what was said before placing my stance, as at the moment i'm very much on the fence. Cheers, Gob lin 09:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC) I ♥ GoblinBots![reply]

I just discussed what else I have been doing besides RfD such as creating articles (I should do more), improving articles (adding more content and sources, wikifying articles, correcting spelling, etc). I am also focusing on correcting stub types. I also have recently been adding Commons images to articles that need images. --Bsa dow ski1 17:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for that Brian. It would be brilliant if you could pop it all on wiki from the offset though in future, especially if it's something that everyone might (or should) like to know. Cheers, Gob lin 18:20, 13 November 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Juliancolton![reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.